Project management as information management in interdisciplinary research: "Lots of different pieces working together"

Abstract Project Management (PM) 1 in publicly funded interdisciplinary research (IDR) 2 is an emerging practice for academic scholars, one that derives from PM’s origins in the industrial sector. The naturalistic paradigm that guided this case study of the third Digging Into Data Challenge (2014–2016) relied upon qualitative methods, a case study reporting mode, purposive sampling, and inductive, grounded data analysis. Fifty-three researchers representing eleven projects were interviewed. Results suggest that the grant’s PM requirement provided researchers with a mechanism of information management. Project managers, whether externally hired or internally designated, were instrumental in coordinating project resources in light of governance issues, data handling, and data sharing across international boundaries. In conclusion, optimizing PM documentation from project inception through closure is recommended to facilitate communications among funders, researchers, and stakeholders. PM documentation is a mechanism for ensuring data integrity and its readiness for valuation metrics at project’s end. Future research may explore the merits of mandating formally trained project managers versus supporting academic mentoring trends for project-based training, which apply domain-specific expertise to the role and enable IDR teams to exercise autonomy.

[1]  Alison Pickard,et al.  Research Methods in Information , 2007 .

[2]  Ashley Reed,et al.  Managing an Established Digital Humanities Project: Principles and Practices from the Twentieth Year of the William Blake Archive , 2014, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[3]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[4]  Danguole Kviklys.  Project management for information professionals , 2017 .

[5]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[6]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[7]  Joyce Ray.  The Rise of Digital Curation and Cyberinfrastructure: From Experimentation to Implementation and Maybe Integration , 2012, Libr. Hi Tech.

[8]  Gail Steinhart.  Libraries as Distributors of Geospatial Data: Data Management Policies as Tools for Managing Partnerships , 2006, Libr. Trends.

[9]  Matthew S. Mayernik,et al.  Who’s Got the Data? Interdependencies in Science and Technology Collaborations , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  G. Sayeed Choudhury,et al.  Case Study in Data Curation at Johns Hopkins University , 2009, Libr. Trends.

[11]  Mary Feeney,et al.  Project Management in Practice: Implementing a Process to Ensure Accountability and Success , 2011 .

[12]  Panos Constantopoulos,et al.  An Approach to Analyzing Working Practices of Research Communities in the Humanities , 2013 .

[13]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[14]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technical Systems Development Risk Factors: The Role of Empowering Leadership in Lowering Developers’ Stress , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  A. Strauss.  THE ARTICULATION OF PROJECT WORK: AN ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS , 1988 .

[16]  C. Borgman.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2007 .

[17]  Anna Gold,et al.  Cyberinfrastructure, Data, and Libraries, Part 1 , 2007 .

[18]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[19]  Katherine A. Lawrence.  Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Helen R. Tibbo,et al.  Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibilities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills , 2011 .

[21]  David Abramson,et al.  Special Theme: Project Management in E-Science: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[23]  Mark D. Winston,et al.  Project Management in Libraries , 2005 .

[24]  Nancy L. Maron,et al.  Sustaining the Digital Humanities : Host Institution Support Beyond the Start-up Period , 2014 .

[25]  Susan Wells Parham,et al.  NSF DMP content analysis: What are researchers saying? , 2012 .

[26]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Curating research data: the potential roles of libraries and information professionals , 2014, J. Documentation.

[27]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[28]  Andrew Sallans,et al.  DMP Online and DMPTool: Different Strategies Towards a Shared Goal , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Curation.