How Benefits and Challenges of Personal Response System Impact Students' Continuance Intention? A Taiwanese Context

To address four issues observed from the latest Personal Response System (PRS) review by Kay and LeSage (2009), this paper investigates, through a systematic research, how the derived benefits and challenges of PRS affect the satisfaction and continuance intention of college students in Taiwan. The empirical study samples representative college students enrolled in three universities from each of the Northern, Central, Southern, and Eastern geographical regions in Taiwan. The results based on 406 valid returned questionnaires and partial least square analysis confirm that classroom environment and learning benefits have positive effects, whereas technology- and student-based challenges have negative effects on student satisfaction, thus influencing their intention to continue using PRS. In contrast, assessment benefits and teacher-based challenges do not have significant influences on student satisfaction. The present research contributes to literature by empirically testing PRS benefits and challenges derived from previous works, validating only the aspects that influence student satisfaction and, consequently, their behavioral intention to continue using PRS. The implications and suggestions derived from this rigorous research are highly relevant in practice. The findings enable a set of general design strategies for successful PRS implementations, providing the empirical basis for conducting future in-depth PRS research.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Amy Hoyt,et al.  An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  Edwin R. Griff,et al.  Early identification of at-risk students using a personal response system , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness on Student Achievement of a Student Response System versus Online WebCT Quizzes , 2006 .

[6]  M. Oliver,et al.  Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice , 2007 .

[7]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: Does methodology matter when measuring computer-mediated communication competence? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Hugh A. Stoddard,et al.  A Controlled Study of Improvements in Student Exam Performance With the Use of an Audience Response System During Medical School Lectures , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[13]  Eugene Judson,et al.  Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls , 2002 .

[14]  Blanca Hernández Ortega,et al.  The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[16]  Louis Abrahamson A Brief History of Networked Classrooms: Effects, Cases, Pedagogy, and Implications , 2006 .

[17]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[20]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Terence M. Hancock,et al.  Use of audience response systems for summative assessment in large classes , 2010 .

[22]  Carla Carnaghan,et al.  Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning and Engagement in Accounting Education , 2007 .

[23]  Douglas Duncan,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems , 2004 .

[24]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[25]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[27]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition , 1987 .

[29]  Tzyh-Lih Hsia,et al.  A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[30]  G. DeBourgh,et al.  Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most? , 2003, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[31]  Szu-Yuan Sun,et al.  What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  D'Arcy Effective Use of a Personal Response System in a General Education Plant Pathology Class , 2007 .

[34]  R. d'Inverno,et al.  Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction , 2003 .