The coal cleat system: A new approach to its study

Abstract After a general analysis regarding the concept of coal “cleat system”, its genetic origin and practical applications to coalbed methane (CBM) commercial production and to CO 2 geological sequestration projects, the authors have developed a method to answer, quickly and accurately in accordance with the industrial practice and needs, the following yet unanswered questions: (1) how to define the spatial orientation of the different classes of cleats presented in a coal seam and (2) how to determine the frequency of their connectivites. The new available and presented techniques to answer these questions have a strong computer based tool (geographic information system, GIS), able to build a complete georeferentiated database, which will allow to three-dimensionally locate the laboratory samples in the coalfield. It will also allow to better understand the coal cleat system and consequently to recognize the best pathways to gas flow through the coal seam. Such knowledge is considered crucial for understanding what is likely to be the most efficient opening of cleat network, then allowing the injection with the right spatial orientation, of pressurized fluids in order to directly drain the maximum amount of gas flow to a CBM exploitation well. The method is also applicable to the CO 2 geological sequestration technologies and operations corresponding to the injection of CO 2 sequestered from industrial plants in coal seams of abandoned coal mines or deep coal seams.

[1]  K. Elewaut,et al.  Application of X-ray computed tomography for analyzing cleat spacing and cleat aperture in coal samples , 2006 .

[2]  Barry Ryan,et al.  Cleat Development in Some British Columbia Coals , 2003 .

[3]  Carlo D. Montemagno,et al.  Fracture network versus single fractures: Measurement of fracture geometry with X-ray tomography , 1999 .

[4]  D. Johnson,et al.  Coal microstructure and micropermeability and their effects on natural gas recovery , 1992 .

[5]  David C. Glick,et al.  Coal and gas outbursts in footwalls of reverse faults , 2001 .

[6]  S. Durucan,et al.  Improving the CO2 well injectivity and enhanced coalbed methane production performance in coal seams , 2009 .

[7]  F. Ting.  Origin and Spacing of Cleats in Coal Beds , 1977 .

[8]  Romeo M. Flores,et al.  Coalbed methane: From hazard to resource , 1998 .

[9]  A. Schimmelmann,et al.  Diagenetic mineralization in Pennsylvanian coals from Indiana, USA: 13C/12C and 18O/16O implications for cleat origin and coalbed methane generation , 2008 .

[10]  I. Mackinnon,et al.  Cleat mineralization of Upper Permian Baralaba/Rangal Coal Measures, Bowen Basin, Australia , 1996, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[11]  Van Krevelen,et al.  Coal: Typology - Physics - Chemistry - Constitution , 1993 .

[12]  Walter B. Ayers.  Coalbed gas systems, resources, and production and a review of contrasting cases from the San Juan and Powder River basins , 2002 .

[13]  R. P. Nickelsen,et al.  Jointing in the Appalachian Plateau of Pennsylvania , 1967 .

[14]  S. Laubach,et al.  Coal Fracture (Cleat) Patterns in Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico - Implications for Coalbed Methane Exploration and Development , 1991 .

[15]  B. Alpern,et al.  Documented international enquiry on solid sedimentary fossil fuels; coal: definitions, classifications, reserves-resources, and energy potential , 2002 .

[16]  X. Su,et al.  The characteristics and origins of cleat in coal from Western North China , 2001 .

[17]  J. Olson,et al.  Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review , 1998 .

[18]  C. Karacan,et al.  Fracture/cleat analysis of coals from Zonguldak Basin (northwestern Turkey) relative to the potential of coalbed methane production , 2000 .

[19]  Maria Mastalerz,et al.  Cleats and their relation to geologic lineaments and coalbed methane potential in Pennsylvanian coals in Indiana , 2007 .