Optimizing Item Exposure Control Algorithms for Polytomous Computerized Adaptive Tests With Restricted Item Banks

In the face of modern-day developments in translating assessment instruments into computer-based adaptive measures, more and more concerns regarding test security and test validity have been raised. Further, as non-cognitive measures are being transformed into functioning CATs, item exposure control has become an important component of managing item banks. With the inception of evaluating exposure control mechanisms conditionally, many of the non-high stakes assessments are now seeking solutions to issues associated with constrained item banks and limited item availability. This simulation study compared three item exposure control mechanisms (Sympson-Hetter conditional, progressive restrictive maximum information, and total rate simplified exposure) against two unmanaged CAT administrations (simple maximum information and random item selection) for two restrictive item bank conditions. The competing methods were evaluated in their ability to provide conditional exposure control along with adequate bias, root mean square errors, and deviations of asymptotic valid standard errors from observed conditional standard deviations. Benefits and shortcomings are discussed.

[1]  Vicente Ponsoda,et al.  A Comparison of Item Exposure Control Methods in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[2]  David J. Weiss,et al.  APPLICATION OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING TO EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS , 1984 .

[3]  P. Fayers Item Response Theory for Psychologists , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[5]  F. Samejima Graded Response Model , 1997 .

[6]  Eiji Muraki,et al.  Fitting a Polytomous Item Response Model to Likert-Type Data , 1990 .

[7]  F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .

[8]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice , 2000 .

[9]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Developing a Common Metric in Item Response Theory , 1982 .

[10]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing , 1992 .

[11]  Rebecca D. Hetter,et al.  Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. , 1997 .

[12]  Anthony R. Zara,et al.  A Comparison of Procedures for Content-Sensitive Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Tests. , 1991 .

[13]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  A Review of Item Exposure Control Strategies for Computerized Adaptive Testing Developed from 1983 to 2005 , 2007 .

[14]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Controlling Item Exposure Conditional on Ability in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[15]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer , 2000 .

[16]  Bor-Yaun Twu,et al.  A Comparative Study of Item Exposure Control Methods in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[17]  E. Muraki A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM Algorithm , 1992 .

[18]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Controlling Item Exposure Conditional on Ability in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1995 .

[19]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Book Review : New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing David J. Weiss (Ed.) New York: Academic Press, 1983, 345 pp., $35.00 , 1984 .

[20]  E. Muraki Information Functions of the Generalized Partial Credit Model , 1993 .

[21]  R. J. Mokken,et al.  Handbook of modern item response theory , 1997 .