An analysis of policy scenario effects on the adoption of energy production on the farm: a case study in Emilia-Romagna (Italy).

The agriculture sector’s contribution to energy production is a central issue in ongoing policy debates, and one of the central elements of the development of Bioeconomy sector. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is one of the main determinants of the different farm strategies of European farmers. The CAP is now undergoing a thorough revision process which necessarily includes a debate of the role of the policy in rural areas and the effectiveness of the various CAP policy mechanisms. The objective of this paper is to assess the impact of alternative CAP scenarios in the light of the possible changes in 2013 and the willingness to adopt energy plants for energy crops in the Province of Bologna (Italy). This is pursued using both survey information and farm-household mathematical programming models, hence using stated intentions and simulated profitability to analyse the adopt of new technologies for energy production. The results underscore the relevance of the CAP scenarios in altering intentions with regard to the adoption of energy production and the relevant effect of uncertainty in delaying the diffusion of energy production systems.

[1]  D. Just,et al.  The Economics of a Blend Mandate for Biofuels , 2009 .

[2]  D. Viaggi,et al.  The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size , 2013 .

[3]  Assessing the CAP influence on European farmers’ preferences towards the adoption of renewable energy production. , 2013 .

[4]  D. Viaggi,et al.  Assessing the effect of the CAP on farm innovation adoption. An analysis in two French regions , 2011 .

[5]  A. Gasparatos.  Resource consumption in Japanese agriculture and its link to food security , 2011 .

[6]  A. Tabeau,et al.  Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets , 2008 .

[7]  Davide Viaggi,et al.  Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts , 2011 .

[8]  Sylvain Leduc,et al.  Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. , 2011 .

[9]  Elizabeth H A Mattison,et al.  Intentions of UK farmers toward biofuel crop production: implications for policy targets and land use change. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Aude Ridier,et al.  Farm Level Supply of Short Rotation Woody Crops: Economic Assessment in the Long‐Term for Household Farming Systems , 2012 .

[11]  P. Ciaian,et al.  Interdependencies in the Energy-Bioenergy-Food Price Systems: A Cointegration Analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Francesco Marangon,et al.  Biomass energy production in agriculture: A weighted goal programming analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Alan Swinbank.  EU Policies on Bioenergy and their Potential Clash with the WTO , 2009 .

[14]  Basil D. Manos,et al.  Impact assessment of CAP policies on social sustainability in rural areas: an application in Northern Greece , 2011, Oper. Res..

[15]  Assessment of economic effects of innovations in automatic milking systems in Podlaskie region (Poland) with the use of real option approach , 2011 .

[16]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[17]  Fabio Bartolini,et al.  Modelling the adoption of automatic milking systems in Noord-Holland , 2010 .

[18]  J. Petersen.  Energy Production with Agricultural Biomass: Environmental Implications and Analytical Challenges , 2008 .

[19]  J. Taylor,et al.  Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions , 2003 .

[20]  F. Vöhringer,et al.  Competition between biomass and food production in the presence of energy policies: a partial equilibrium analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Alan A. Carruth,et al.  What Do We Know about Investment under Uncertainty , 2000 .

[22]  Jeroen Buysse,et al.  Normative, positive and econometric mathematical programming as tools for incorporation of multifunctionality in agricultural policy modelling , 2007 .

[23]  Saban Nazlioglu,et al.  World oil and agricultural commodity prices: Evidence from nonlinear causality , 2011 .

[24]  M. Raggi,et al.  FARM INVESTMENT BEHAVIOUR UNDER THE CAP REFORM PROCESS , 2011 .

[25]  Daniel A. Sumner,et al.  Agricultural technologies for climate change in developing countries: Policy options for innovation and technology diffusion , 2012 .

[26]  D. Bunn,et al.  Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy , 2007 .

[27]  Investment in a Methane Digester: An Application of Capital Budgeting and Real Options , 2008 .

[28]  Jeremy Franks,et al.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: Avoiding trivial solutions to a global problem , 2012 .

[29]  Fei Li,et al.  A system dynamics model for analyzing the eco-agriculture system with policy recommendations , 2012 .

[30]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[31]  Alan Swinbank,et al.  Biofuel Policies in the EU, US and Brazil Les politiques en matière de biocarburants dans l’Union européenne, aux États-Unis et au Brésil Politikmaßnahmen zu Biokraftstoffen in der EU, den USA und Brasilien , 2011 .

[32]  Tyrone T. Lin,et al.  Applying real options in investment decisions relating to environmental pollution , 2007 .