Performance Analysis of Airborne Photon- Counting Lidar Data in Preparation for the ICESat-2 Mission

Two airborne photon-counting laser altimeters have been deployed in direct support of National Aeronautics and Space Adminsitration (NASA’s) upcoming Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) mission. Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) was developed specifically for ICESat-2 testing and development. MABEL data are used to simulate key aspects of the ICESat-2 measurement strategy and are critical to the development of the algorithms for geophysical data-product generation. Slope Imaging Multi-polarization Photon-counting Lidar (SIMPL) is a NASA Goddard Space Flight Center instrument that has also been deployed in support of ICESat-2 performance discovery. Both instruments are photon-counting, small footprint laser altimeters that sample in both the 532- and 1064-nm wavelengths. And both instruments serve as a proxy for ICESat-2 operational performance and error assessment and a basis for the development of potential validation strategies. This paper provides an overview of how data from MABEL and SIMPL overflights have specifically provided the foundation for understanding the quality of ICESat-2 data and how we can plan to evaluate ICESat-2 products through comparison with other modalities of lidar data and/or ground-truth locations using ground fiducials.

[1]  John J. Degnan,et al.  Photon-Counting Multikilohertz Microlaser Altimeters for Airborne and Spaceborne Topographic Measurements , 2013 .

[2]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  An automated statistical analysis approach to noise reduction for photon-counting lidar systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[3]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  Algorithm for Detection of Ground and Canopy Cover in Micropulse Photon-Counting Lidar Altimeter Data in Preparation for the ICESat-2 Mission , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  C. E. Webb,et al.  In situ timing and pointing verification of the ICESat altimeter using a ground‐based system , 2005 .

[5]  J. Degnan Millimeter Accuracy Satellite Laser Ranging: a Review , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Studinger,et al.  Polar Airborne Observations Fill Gap in Satellite Data , 2010 .

[7]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  The Potential Impact of Vertical Sampling Uncertainty on ICESat-2/ATLAS Terrain and Canopy Height Retrievals for Multiple Ecosystems , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[8]  J. Degnan Unified Approach to Photon-Counting Microlaser Rangers, Transponders, and Altimeters , 2001 .

[9]  V. Stanley Scott,et al.  The Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL): An Airborne Simulator for the ICESat-2 Mission , 2013 .

[10]  Charmien Johnson Msfc Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite , 2013 .

[11]  John J. Degnan,et al.  Scanning, Multibeam, Single Photon Lidars for Rapid, Large Scale, High Resolution, Topographic and Bathymetric Mapping , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[12]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of the ICESat Mission , 2005 .

[13]  A. Lynn Abbott,et al.  A two-stage algorithm for extraction of ground and top of canopy in photon-counting profiling-LiDAR data in preparation for the ICESat-2 mission , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[14]  Nicolas David,et al.  Towards 3D lidar point cloud registration improvement using optimal neighborhood knowledge , 2013 .

[15]  Amy L. Neuenschwander,et al.  Applicability of an automatic surface detection approach to micro-pulse photon-counting lidar altimetry data: implications for canopy height retrieval from future ICESat-2 data , 2014 .

[16]  David J. Harding,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation , 2017 .

[17]  Kelly M. Brunt,et al.  Determination of Local Slope on the Greenland Ice Sheet Using a Multibeam Photon-Counting Lidar in Preparation for the ICESat-2 Mission , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Jan McGarry,et al.  DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF AN AIRBORNE MULTIKILOHERTZ PHOTON-COUNTING, MICROLASER ALTIMETER , 2004 .

[19]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Reduction of ICESat systematic geolocation errors and the impact on ice sheet elevation change detection , 2005 .

[20]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  MABEL Photon-Counting Laser Altimetry Data in Alaska for ICESat-2 Simulations and Development , 2014 .

[21]  Kelly M. Brunt,et al.  Inland and Near-Shore Water Profiles Derived from the High-Altitude Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) , 2016, Journal of Coastal Research.

[22]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Profiling Sea Ice with a Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) , 2014 .

[23]  William E. Carter,et al.  Adjustment of systematic errors in ALS data through surface matching , 2011 .

[24]  Helen Amanda Fricker,et al.  The ICESat-2 Laser Altimetry Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Jeffrey R. Stevens,et al.  Quantitative data quality metrics for 3D laser radar systems , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  ICESat Altimetry Data Product Verification at White Sands Space Harbor , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Higinio González-Jorge,et al.  Evaluation of point cloud registration using Monte Carlo method , 2016 .