Delayed habituation of the electrodermal orienting response as a function of increased level of arousal.

Level of arousal was manipulated by having subjects perform arithmetic tasks during a habituation procedure, which consisted of 55 presentations or a 1000 Hz. 80 dB tone. For one group a threat of shock was added to the task performance in order to include aspects of stress in the arousal manipulation. These two groups were compared with a group who heard the same stimuli but were simply instructed to relax. The three groups differed in level of arousal according to KEG signs of drowsiness, skin conductance level, and frequency of spontaneous skin conductance responses, All three groups differed from each other in number of trials to habituation criterion for skin conductance responses to stimuli. Since the delay of habituation was seen tin- both the Task group and the Shock-threat group, it was concluded that the effect was not bound to aspects of stress but was a general effect of increased arousal. For vasomotor responses an analysis in terms of habituation was difficult to apply because the two high arousal groups were very unresponsive from the beginning.

[1]  K. Pribram,et al.  Habituation of GSR as a function of stimulus duration and spontaneous activity. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  L. Johnson,et al.  HABITUATION OF THE ORIENTING RESPONSE IN ALERT AND DROWSY SUBJECTS. , 1964, Psychophysiology.

[3]  G. Bohlin The relationship between arousal level and habituation of the orienting reaction , 1973 .

[4]  E. Katkin RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANIFEST ANXIETY AND TWO INDICES OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSE TO STRESS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  T. Ball,et al.  Plethysmographic and GSR responses to single versus double-simultaneous novel tactile stimuli. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Mathews,et al.  A physiological model of phobic anxiety and desensitization. , 1968, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  L. H. Miller,et al.  Replicability of two GSR indices as a function of stress and cognitive activity. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  L. Johnson Some attributes of spontaneous autonomic activity. , 1963 .

[9]  A Kjellberg,et al.  Self-reported arousal: further development of a multi-factorial inventory. , 1974, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[10]  J. Thayer,et al.  Relationship between levels of arousal and responsiveness among schizophrenic and normal subjects. , 1971, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  B. Tizard Evoked changes in EEG and electrodermal activity during the waking and sleeping states. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D G Kilpatrick,et al.  Differential responsiveness of two electrodermal indices to psychological stress and performance of a complex cognitive task. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[13]  L. Johnson,et al.  The orienting reflex during waking and sleeping. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Katkin,et al.  Habituation of the orienting response as a function of individual differences in anxiety and autonomic lability. , 1969, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  A. Kjellberg,et al.  Self-reported arousal during sleep deprivation and its relation to performance and physiological variables. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[16]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Effects of stress on habituation of the orienting reflex. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  G. Bohlin Interaction of arousal and habituation in the development of sleep during monotonous stimulation. , 1973, Biological psychology.

[18]  J. Furedy Human orienting reaction as a function of electrodermal versus plethysmographic response modes and single versus alternating stimulus series. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  T. Scholander Habituation of autonomic response elements under two conditions of alertness. , 1960, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.