The matrix alters the role of path redundancy on patch colonization rates.

Landscape connectivity is central to many problems in ecology and conservation. Recently, the role of path redundancies on movement of organisms has been emphasized for understanding connectivity, because increasing the number of potential paths (i.e., redundancy) is predicted to increase movement rates, which can alter predictions for foraging theory and population dynamics. Nonetheless, experiments that test for the effects of path redundancies on connectivity remain scarce. We tested for the role of path redundancies on the movements of a habitat specialist, Chelinidea vittiger, using experimental arenas that altered path redundancy by varying the amount and configuration of stepping stones across a gradient of matrix resistance. We found that stepping-stone redundancies increased colonization rates to target patches, but the effects differed depending on the configuration of redundancy and the structure of the matrix. In addition, matrix effects were better explained through the use of effective distance measures that incorporate redundancy in the matrix than those that ignore redundancy. Our results provide experimental evidence that measures that ignore redundancies may be inadequate for capturing functional connectivity, illustrate the ways in which redundancies alter colonization rates, and emphasize how habitat configuration and matrix structure can interact to guide movement of individuals across landscapes.

[1]  Neil J. Anderson,et al.  Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. , 2009, Ecology.

[2]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[3]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[4]  Wiley M. Kitchens,et al.  Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution , 2013, Nature Communications.

[5]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[6]  Robert J. Jr. Fletcher,et al.  Signal detection theory clarifies the concept of perceptual range and its relevance to landscape connectivity , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[8]  R. Holt A neglected facet of island biogeography: The role of internal spatial dynamics in area effects , 1992 .

[9]  M. Fortin,et al.  EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .

[10]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Movements of cactus bugs: Patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[12]  J. Ahern From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world , 2011 .

[13]  William F Morris,et al.  The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. , 2010, Ecology.

[14]  D. Tallmon,et al.  Effects of the landscape on boreal toad gene flow: does the pattern–process relationship hold true across distinct landscapes at the northern range margin? , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[15]  M. Acevedo,et al.  Social network models predict movement and connectivity in ecological landscapes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Gilpin,et al.  The role of stepping-stone islands. , 1980, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[18]  J. Wiens,et al.  SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF CACTUS BUGS: AREA CONSTRAINTS AND PATCH CONNECTIVITY , 2005 .

[19]  Negative and matrix-dependent effects of dispersal corridors in an experimental metacommunity. , 2013, Ecology.

[20]  D. Legrand,et al.  Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  Valerie Kapos,et al.  Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research , 2012 .

[22]  R. Ims,et al.  Optimal width of movement corridors for root voles : not too marrow and not too wide , 1996 .

[23]  James T. Cronin,et al.  THE MATRIX ENHANCES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRIDORS AND STEPPING STONES , 2004 .

[24]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  R package gdistance: distances and routes on geographical grids (version 1.1-4) , 2012 .

[25]  P. Holme,et al.  Agent-based model approach to optimal foraging in heterogeneous landscapes: effects of patch clumpiness , 2007 .

[26]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[27]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.