Circles of support and accountability: The characteristics of core members in England and Wales

BACKGROUND Circles of support and accountability, or Circles, use community volunteers to help reintegrate sex offenders at risk of reoffending in the community. AIMS The aims of this study are to describe the first 275 male sex offenders ('core members') in England and Wales supported by a Circle and to compare those attending the five largest Circles. METHODS As part of their monitoring activity, 10 Circles extracted data from case files, anonymised it and submitted it to Circles UK, the national oversight body. RESULTS Circles have expanded rapidly with 165 (60%) of Circles commencing in the three years 2011-2013 compared with 110 in the nine years 2002-2010. Most core members were referred from the Probation Service (82%). Circles were provided to men with a range of predicted risks of reoffending - from low (26%) to very high (12%). There were some positive changes between the beginning and end of Circles, such as fewer men being unemployed and more living in their own chosen accommodation. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Circles have been used to support the reintegration of a wide range of sex offenders. Given their rapid growth and flexibility, consistent recording standards are required across. These standards should be reviewed periodically to ensure all important fields of change are captured, including frequency of attendance, length per session and quality of engagement in the work. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Robin J. Wilson,et al.  Circles of Support , 2002 .

[2]  M. Nellis Circles of support and accountability for sex offenders in England and Wales: Their origins and implementation between 1999-2005 , 2009 .

[3]  Robin J. Wilson,et al.  Circles of Support & Accountability: A Canadian National Replication of Outcome Findings , 2009, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[4]  Dominic Williams,et al.  Circles South East , 2014, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[5]  D. Thornton,et al.  Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  B. Völlm,et al.  Circles of Support and Accountability: An Innovative Approach to Manage High-Risk Sex Offenders in the Community , 2010 .

[7]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment , 2006 .

[8]  David Thompson,et al.  Assessing the impact of Circles of Support and Accountability on the reintegration of adults convicted of sexual offences in the community , 2014 .

[9]  Robin J. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Professionally-Facilitated Volunteerism in the Community-Based Management of High-Risk Sexual Offenders: Part Two - A Comparison of Recidivism Rates , 2007 .

[10]  G. Duwe Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Work in the United States? Preliminary Results From a Randomized Experiment in Minnesota , 2013, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[11]  Hazel Kemshall,et al.  The operation and experience of Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) , 2007 .

[12]  M. Petrunik,et al.  Circles of Support and Accountability: A Community Justice Initiative for the Reintegration of High Risk Sex Offenders , 2007 .

[13]  C. Officer Circles of Support and Accountability , and community reintegration for those at risk of sexually reoffending , 2012 .

[14]  S. Bogaerts,et al.  Circles of Support and Accountability: How and Why They Work for Sex Offenders , 2013 .

[15]  T. Ward,et al.  Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model , 2003 .

[16]  Tony Ward,et al.  Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders , 2006 .