Effect of freeform surfaces on the volume and performance of unobscured three mirror imagers in comparison with off-axis rotationally symmetric polynomials.

The invention of new design techniques for unobscured reflective systems using freeform surfaces has expanded the optical design space for these system types. We illustrate how the use of freeform surfaces can expand the design space of the Three Mirror Compact design type to allow both better performance at a given system volume and smaller volumes for a given performance target. By evolving designs using conventional off-axis asphere type surfaces to ever smaller volumes and then converting these off-axis asphere descriptions to centered Zernike descriptions, we show that the wavefront error improves by up to 69% in this case by allowing the surfaces to break rotational symmetry. In addition, we show that evolving designs from the same starting point as the off-axis asphere designs but instead using a centered Zernike description can produce a design with a 39% smaller volume in this case while maintaining the same diffraction-limited performance.

[1]  Dietrich Korsch.  Closed-form solutions for imaging systems, corrected for third-order aberrations , 1973 .

[2]  John R. Rogers,et al.  Techniques and tools for obtaining symmetrical performance from tilted-component systems , 2000 .

[3]  K. Thompson,et al.  Theory of aberration fields for general optical systems with freeform surfaces. , 2014, Optics express.

[4]  K. Thompson,et al.  Freeform spectrometer enabling increased compactness , 2017, Light: Science & Applications.

[5]  Andrew Rakich,et al.  Method for deriving the complete solution set for three-mirror anastigmatic telescopes with two spherical mirrors. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  G W Forbes.  Robust, efficient computational methods for axially symmetric optical aspheres. , 2010, Optics express.

[7]  R A Buchroeder.  Tilted-component telescopes. Part I: theory. , 1970, Applied optics.

[8]  K. Thompson,et al.  A new family of optical systems employing φ-polynomial surfaces. , 2011, Optics express.

[9]  Andrew Rakich.  Reflecting anastigmatic optical systems: a retrospective , 2018 .

[10]  Joseph M. Howard,et al.  Starting point designs for freeform four-mirror systems , 2018 .

[11]  Jannick P Rolland,et al.  Starting geometry creation and design method for freeform optics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[12]  Gregg E. Davis,et al.  Assembly of a freeform off-axis optical system employing three φ-polynomial Zernike mirrors. , 2014, Optics letters.

[13]  H. Gross,et al.  Performance comparison of polynomial representations for optimizing optical freeform systems , 2015, SPIE Optical Systems Design.

[14]  Jannick P Rolland,et al.  On-the-fly surface manufacturability constraints for freeform optical design enabled by orthogonal polynomials. , 2019, Optics express.

[15]  Xu Liu,et al.  Design of reflective projection lens with Zernike polynomials surfaces , 2008, Displays.

[16]  J. Michael Rodgers.  Unobscured mirror designs , 2002, International Optical Design Conference.

[17]  Christophe Gaschet,et al.  Combining freeform optics and curved detectors for wide field imaging: a polynomial approach over squared aperture. , 2017, Optics express.

[18]  Zhu Jun,et al.  Design of a low F-number freeform off-axis three-mirror system with rectangular field-of-view , 2015 .