Liquid feeding of pigs : potential for reducing environmental impact and for improving productivity and food safety.

Summary Liquid feeding creates an opportunity to recycle liquid residues from the human food industry as animal feed. Such residues are often low in dry matter and variable in composition. However, if diets are reformulated frequently to take account of such changes there is no loss of productivity and profitability can be increased. Modern liquid feeding equipment facilitates frequent changes in diet composition, delivery of different diets to different pens of pigs and enables pigs to be fed ad libitum or accurately rationed. These features provide an opportunity to use ‘step’ and ‘phase’ feeding regimes that can reduce the nutrient content of effluent and reduce environmental loading. Current research is investigating ways of increasing the efficiency of utilization specific raw materials by the targeted use of exogenous enzymes. Surveillance studies have shown that liquid feeding reduces Salmonella incidence. This has been particularly associated with the use of acidic residues derived from the food industry. More recently, and particularly because producers wish to feed liquid diets ad libitum, there has been much interest in the concept of feeding fermented liquid feed (FLF) to pigs. Natural, uncontrolled fermentation has produced very mixed results on commercial units. However, when selected lactic acid bacteria inoculants are used and fermentation conditions are carefully controlled, an acidic diet is produced that rapidly and effectively excludes enteropathogens. Such feed is readily accepted by pigs and it has been shown to enhance post–weaning growth and reduce coliform levels in the lower gut. Because of this FLF may be a useful alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. Although results in experimental units are impressive, more research is needed before we can provide Standard Operating Procedures relevant to different conditions. These are needed to enable the transfer of this exciting technologyto commercial pig units.

[1]  P. H. Brooks,et al.  The water requirement of growing-finishing pigs - theoretical and practical considerations. , 1990 .

[2]  J. Wood,et al.  Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , 2003 .

[3]  J. Beal.  Potential use of protease enzymes in liquid diets for pigs , 1999 .

[4]  A. Altrock.  Results of the German Investigation in the EU-Project "Salmonella in Pork (Salinpork)": Investigations on farms , 2001 .

[5]  H. Smith,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON THE ALIMENTARY TRACT AND ITS BACTERIAL FLORA IN HEALTHY AND DISEASED PIGS. , 1963, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[6]  J. Beal,et al.  Effect on weaner pig performance and diet microbiology of feeding a liquid diet acidified to pH 4 with either lactic acid or through fermentation with Pediococcus acidilactici , 1999 .

[7]  B. B. Jensen.  The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs , 1998 .

[8]  M. Tielen,et al.  Salmonella infections in finishing pigs in The Netherlands: bacteriological herd prevalence, serogroup and antibiotic resistance of isolates and risk factors for infection. , 1999, Veterinary microbiology.

[9]  P. H. Brooks,et al.  Performance, Water Use and Effluent Output of Weaner Pigs Fed ad libitumwith Either Dry Pellets or Liquid Feed and the Role of Microbial Activity in the Liquid Feed , 1996 .

[10]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Dietary manipulation of gastric pH in the prophylaxis of enteric disease in weaned pigs: some field observations , 1981, Veterinary Record.

[11]  C. Atwood,et al.  Maintenance of villus height and crypt depth, and enhancement of disaccharide digestion and monosaccharide absorption, in piglets fed on cows' whole milk after weaning , 1996, British Journal of Nutrition.

[12]  M. Tielen,et al.  Risk factors and control measures for subclinical salmonella infection in pig herds , 1997 .

[13]  R. Fuller,et al.  The effect of yoghurt and milk fermented with a porcine intestinal strain of Lactobacillus reuteri on the performance and gastrointestinal flora of pigs weaned at two days of age , 1986 .

[14]  J. Wiseman,et al.  Feeding liquid diets to pigs. , 2001 .

[15]  P. H. Brooks,et al.  Performance of Weaner Pigs Fed ad libitumwith Liquid Feed at Different Dry Matter Concentrations , 1996 .

[16]  J. Pluske,et al.  Villous height and crypt depth in piglets in response to increases in the intake of cows' milk after weaning , 1996 .

[17]  D. Noakes,et al.  Gastric secretion and fermentation in the suckling pig , 1976, British Journal of Nutrition.

[18]  J. Snijders,et al.  Feed as a vehiculum of salmonella in pigs , 1997 .

[19]  S. Biesterveld,et al.  Mechanism of Salmonella reduction in fermented pig feed , 2001 .

[20]  R. M. Beal,et al.  The effect on performance and bacterial flora of lactic acid, propionic acid, calcium propionate and calcium acrylate in the drinking water of weaned pigs , 1968, Veterinary Record.

[21]  Tina M Geary.  IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF WEANER PIGS THROUGH DEVELOPMENTS IN LIQUID FEEDING , 1997 .

[22]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Fermented co-products and fermented compound diets for pigs: a review , 1999 .

[23]  G. Hildebrandt,et al.  [Results of the German investigation on the EU project "Salmonella in Pork (Salinpork)"--1. Investigations in the farms]. , 2000, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.