EU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the bio-economy

The knowledge-based bio-economy has gained prominence as a research and innovation policy of the European Union. As a policy framework the knowledge-based bio-economy has attracted two contending visions, which can be analyzed as imaginaries – strategic discourses prefiguring a possible, desirable future. In the dominant vision, life sciences will enhance productivity for European competitive advantage in global value chains. A rival vision links agroecology and shorter food supply chains, as a means for farmers to gain more from the value that they add. Each vision favors a different diagnosis of unsustainable agriculture and eco-efficient remedies. Each extends a different paradigm of agri-innovation, foreseeing an economic community that can gain from future markets. These two contending visions give different meanings to the same key terms – knowledge, biological resources and economy. In the EU's research program for a knowledge-based bio-economy, a life sciences vision dominates the priorities, though agroecology has also gained a significant place in response to proposals from stakeholder networks. Through these efforts, research policy priorities have been opened up to more plural agri-innovation pathways.

[1]  R. Stone The European Research Area : new perspectives , 2014 .

[2]  Máire Geoghegan-Quinn Regional Innovation & European Growth: the new frame 2014-2020: Speech by the Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science , 2014 .

[3]  A. Dobson,et al.  Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability , 2013 .

[4]  L. Levidow,et al.  Challenging unsustainable development through research cooperation , 2012 .

[5]  C. O'Neill,et al.  Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability , 2012 .

[6]  Paul Upham,et al.  Framing environmental sustainability challenges for research and innovation in European policy agendas , 2011 .

[7]  Annette Freibauer,et al.  Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world , 2011 .

[8]  B. Jessop Cultural political economy and critical policy studies , 2010 .

[9]  N. Sum The production of hegemonic policy discourses: ‘competitiveness’ as a knowledge brand and its (re-)contextualizations , 2009 .

[10]  Otto Schmid,et al.  Strategic Research Agenda for organic food and farming , 2009 .

[11]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Reaping the Benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture , 2009 .

[12]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[13]  P. Baret,et al.  How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime that Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks Out Agroecological Innovations , 2009 .

[14]  Niggli Project for a European technological platform on organic agriculture: Vision for an Organic Food and Farming Research Agenda to 2025 , 2009 .

[15]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  New challenges for agricultural research: climate change, food security, rural development, agricultural knowledge systems. 2nd SCAR Foresight exercise , 2009 .

[16]  How to Feed the World in 2050 , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Science and Governance: taking European Knowledge Society Seriously , 2007 .

[18]  Arie Rip,et al.  TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission , 2007 .

[19]  R. Jessop,et al.  Cultural Political economy, the knowledge-based economy, and the state (II) 文化政治經濟學:以知識為基礎的經濟和國家 (下) , 2005 .

[20]  S. Wolf,et al.  Cognitive Representations and Institutional Hybridity in Agrofood Innovation , 2004 .

[21]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process? , 2003 .

[22]  B. Rosamond Imagining the European Economy: 'Competitiveness' and the Social Construction of 'Europe' as an Economic Space , 2002 .

[23]  B. Apeldoorn Transnational class agency and European governance: the case of the European Round Table of Industrialists , 2000 .

[24]  S. Sayer New Political Economy: Review Article , 1999 .

[25]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[26]  L Galambos A technological economy. , 1994, Science.

[27]  Aracruz Celulose S.A Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment , 1992 .