Acetylcholine receptor clustering is triggered by a change in the density of a nonreceptor molecule

Acetylcholine receptors become clustered at the neuromuscular junction during synaptogenesis, at least in part via lateral migration of diffusely expressed receptors. We have shown previously that electric fields initiate a specific receptor clustering event which is dependent on lateral migration in aneural muscle cell cultures (Stollberg, J., and S. E. Fraser. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 107:1397-1408). Subsequent work with this model system ruled out the possibility that the clustering event was triggered by increasing the receptor density beyond a critical threshold (Stollberg, J., and S. E. Fraser. 1990. J. Neurosci. 10:247-255). This leaves two possibilities: the clustering event could be triggered by the field-induced change in the density of some other molecule, or by a membrane voltage-sensitive mechanism (e.g., a voltage- gated calcium signal). Electromigration is a slow, linear process, while voltage-sensitive mechanisms respond in a rapid, nonlinear fashion. Because of this the two possibilities make different predictions about receptor clustering behavior in response to pulsed or alternating electric fields. In the present work we have studied subcellular calcium distributions, as well as receptor clustering, in response to such fields. Subcellular calcium distributions were quantified and found to be consistent with the predicted nonlinear response. Receptor clustering, however, behaves in accordance with the predictions of a linear response, consistent with the electromigration hypothesis. The experiments demonstrate that a local increase in calcium, or, more generally, a voltage-sensitive mechanism, is not sufficient and probably not necessary to trigger receptor clustering. Experiments with slowly alternating electric fields confirm the view that the clustering of acetylcholine receptors is initiated by a local change in the density of some non-receptor molecule.

[1]  T. Usdin,et al.  Purification and characterization of a polypeptide from chick brain that promotes the accumulation of acetylcholine receptors in chick myotubes , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  D. F. Davey,et al.  Localization of acetylcholine receptors and cholinesterase on nerve- contacted and noncontacted muscle cells grown in the presence of agents that block action potentials , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Z. Hall,et al.  Redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on developing rat myotubes , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Neher,et al.  The Ca signal from fura‐2 loaded mast cells depends strongly on the method of dye‐loading , 1985, FEBS letters.

[5]  R. Tsien,et al.  A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  R. Bloch,et al.  Molecular events in synaptogenesis: nerve-muscle adhesion and postsynaptic differentiation. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  P. Cheng,et al.  Formation of ACh receptor clusters induced by positively charged latex beads , 1981, Nature.

[8]  L. Rubin,et al.  Components of Torpedo electric organ and muscle that cause aggregation of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Fluorescent tetramethyl rhodamine derivatives of alpha-bungarotoxin: preparation, separation, and characterization. , 1977, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  B G Wallace,et al.  Regulation of agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor aggregation by Ca++ and phorbol ester , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Electrophoresis of Cytoplasmic Molecules Through Gap Junctions by Externally Applied Electric Fields. , 1989, The Biological bulletin.

[12]  R. Nuccitelli,et al.  Electrical controls of development. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[13]  M. Poo,et al.  Development, maintenance, and modulation of patterned membrane topography: models based on the acetylcholine receptor. , 1982, Current topics in developmental biology.

[14]  M. Poo,et al.  Diffusional and electrokinetic redistribution at the synapse: a physicochemical basis of synaptic competition. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[15]  L. Jaffe Electrophoresis along cell membranes , 1977, Nature.

[16]  W. R. Adey,et al.  Migration of cell surface concanavalin A receptors in pulsed electric fields. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[17]  G. Edelman,et al.  Distinct calcium-independent and calcium-dependent adhesion systems of chicken embryo cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Poo In situ electrophoresis of membrane components. , 1981, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[19]  J. Stollberg,et al.  Local accumulation of acetylcholine receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient to induce cluster formation , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Peng,et al.  Increase in intracellular calcium induced by the polycation-coated latex bead, a stimulus that causes postsynaptic-type differentiation in cultured Xenopus muscle cells. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[21]  N. Spitzer,et al.  The absence of calcium blocks impulse-evoked release of acetylcholine but not de novo formation of functional neuromuscular synaptic contacts in culture , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  H. W. Huang Mobility and diffusion in the plane of cell membrane. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  S. Schuetze,et al.  Developmental regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Functional correlation between cell adhesive properties and some cell surface proteins , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  S. Fraser,et al.  Electric Field-Induced Redistribution of ACh Receptors on Cultured Muscle Cells: Electromigration, Diffusion, and Aggregation. , 1989, The Biological bulletin.

[26]  H. Peng,et al.  Localization of intracellular proteins at acetylcholine receptor clusters induced by electric fields in Xenopus muscle cells. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[27]  Kurt E. Johnson,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[28]  M. Anderson,et al.  Nerve‐induced and spontaneous redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  E. Frank,et al.  Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  H. Peng,et al.  Participation of calcium and calmodulin in the formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  Y. Kidokoro,et al.  Nerve disperses preexisting acetylcholine receptor clusters prior to induction of receptor accumulation in Xenopus muscle cultures. , 1984, Developmental biology.

[32]  R. O’Brien,et al.  On the mechanism of acetylcholine receptor accumulation at newly formed synapses on chick myotubes , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Lilien,et al.  Enzymatic dissection of embryonic cell adhesive mechanisms , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  S. McLaughlin,et al.  The role of electro-osmosis in the electric-field-induced movement of charged macromolecules on the surfaces of cells. , 1981, Biophysical journal.