Estimation of Daily Evapotranspiration Using Instantaneous Decoupling Coefficient From the MODIS and Field Data

Daily evapotranspiration (ET) is of great significance among various practical applications including water management, drought monitoring, and climate change study. The ET estimations from remotely sensed models are usually instantaneous values. Various upscaling methods have been developed to extrapolate the instantaneous ET to daily scale. In the applications of these methods, the accuracy of daily ET estimation relies on both the accuracy of instantaneous ET calculation and the upscaling methods. This paper used the decoupling model to estimate daily ET directly, according to the constancy of the decoupling coefficient (Ω) in the model in a diurnal cycle, without the calculation of instantaneous ET. The estimated daily ET was compared with the Eddy covariance measurements which were corrected by the Bowen ratio method to close the energy imbalances. The result from field data alone showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) of daily ET estimation was 0.860, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 18.2 W/m2, and a bias of −4.7 W/m2. Combining MODIS data and field data, the estimated daily ET had a R2 of 0.860, a RMSE of 21.6 W/m2, and a bias of −5.0 W/m2 . Therefore, it is feasible and effective to obtain daily ET using remote-sensing based instantaneous Ω to replace daily value in the decoupling model.

[1]  P. Jarvis,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – PREDICTING EFFECTS OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON TRANSPIRATION AND EVAPORATION , 1983 .

[2]  C. Long,et al.  Identification of clear skies from broadband pyranometer measurements and calculation of downwelling shortwave cloud effects , 2000 .

[3]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  T. Foken.  The energy balance closure problem: an overview. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Z. Su.  The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[6]  Albert Olioso,et al.  Retrieval of evapotranspiration over the Alpilles/ReSeDA experimental site using airborne POLDER sensor and a thermal camera , 2005 .

[7]  Ronglin Tang,et al.  An intercomparison of three remote sensing-based energy balance models using Large Aperture Scintillometer measurements over a wheat–corn production region , 2011 .

[8]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A thermal-based remote sensing technique for routine mapping of land-surface carbon, water and energy fluxes from field to regional scales , 2008 .

[9]  William P. Kustas,et al.  A reexamination of the crop water stress index , 1988, Irrigation Science.

[10]  Ronglin Tang,et al.  Verification of land surface evapotranspiration estimation from remote sensing spatial contextual information , 2012 .

[11]  G. Kiely,et al.  A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: The role of landscape-scale heterogeneity , 2013 .

[12]  Antonio Roberto Pereira,et al.  The Priestley–Taylor parameter and the decoupling factor for estimating reference evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[13]  W. Bastiaanssen.  SEBAL-based sensible and latent heat fluxes in the irrigated Gediz Basin, Turkey , 2000 .

[14]  Bo-Hui Tang,et al.  Estimation of instantaneous net surface longwave radiation from MODIS cloud-free data , 2008 .

[15]  Ronglin Tang,et al.  Temporal upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration: An intercomparison of four methods using eddy covariance measurements and MODIS data , 2013 .

[16]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  A Review of Current Methodologies for Regional Evapotranspiration Estimation from Remotely Sensed Data , 2009, Sensors.

[17]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at Landsat spatial scales during the BEAREX’08 field campaign , 2012 .

[18]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[19]  T. A. Black,et al.  On the temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration from instantaneous remote sensing measurements to 8-day mean daily-sums , 2012 .

[20]  Eva Boegh,et al.  Evaluating evapotranspiration rates and surface conditions using Landsat TM to estimate atmospheric resistance and surface resistance , 2002 .

[21]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Daily evaporation over a region from lower boundary layer profiles measured with radiosondes , 1991 .

[22]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Radiance‐based validation of the V5 MODIS land‐surface temperature product , 2008 .

[23]  R. Crago,et al.  Conservation and variability of the evaporative fraction during the daytime , 1996 .

[24]  Ronglin Tang,et al.  An improved constant evaporative fraction method for estimating daily evapotranspiration from remotely sensed instantaneous observations , 2017 .

[25]  Frederick C. Meinzer,et al.  Control of transpiration in a 220-year-old Abies amabilis forest , 2001 .

[26]  R. Allen,et al.  At-Surface Reflectance and Albedo from Satellite for Operational Calculation of Land Surface Energy Balance , 2008 .

[27]  Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen,et al.  Reviewing SEBAL input parameters for assessing evapotranspiration and water productivity for the Low - Middle Sao Francisco River basin, Brazil : part A : calibration and validation , 2009 .

[28]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Physiological and environmental control of transpiration by trees in windbreaks , 1998 .

[29]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data , 2008 .