Ranking DMUs by using the upper and lower bounds of the normalized efficiency in data envelopment analysis

Abstract In data envelopment analysis, the existing methods for measuring the relative efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs) are to compare DMUs relative to the best or the worst of all DMUs. In this paper, we consider both the best DMU and the worst DMU as the reference DMUs and propose the normalized efficiency. Further, from the optimistic and pessimistic viewpoints, we construct two DEA models to obtain the upper and lower bounds of the normalized efficiency and then achieve an interval efficiency evaluation to rank all DMUs completely. Finally, two examples are presented to illustrate the performance of the interval efficiency evaluation.

[1]  Byungho Jeong,et al.  A New Ranking Approach with a modified Cross Evaluation Matrix , 2013, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Gholam R. Amin,et al.  Cross-efficiency in DEA: A maximum resonated appreciative model , 2015 .

[3]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[4]  Tser-yieth Chen,et al.  An assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sector , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  G. Jahanshahloo Data Envelopment Analysis with Imprecise Data , 2011 .

[6]  Hossein Azizi,et al.  Improved data envelopment analysis models for evaluating interval efficiencies of decision-making units , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Measuring the performances of decision-making units using interval efficiencies , 2007 .

[8]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Two alternative approaches for selecting performance measures in data envelopment analysis , 2015 .

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  The upper and lower bound evaluation based on the quantile efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Jie Wu,et al.  The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium , 2008, Oper. Res..

[12]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  Slacks-based measures of efficiency in imprecise data envelopment analysis: An approach based on data envelopment analysis with double frontiers , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  I. Contreras,et al.  Optimizing the rank position of the DMU as secondary goal in DEA cross-evaluation , 2012 .

[14]  William W. Cooper,et al.  EXTENSIONS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN DEA , 1996 .

[15]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Upper and Lower Bound Evaluation of Multiattribute Objects: Comparison Models Using Linear Programming , 1995 .

[16]  Feng Yang,et al.  Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Cross-Evaluation in DEA - Improving Discrimiation Among DMUs , 1995 .

[18]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[19]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[20]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[21]  Jie Wu,et al.  Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2008 .

[22]  Jie Wu,et al.  Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[23]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Measuring the performances of decision-making units using geometric average efficiency , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Tomoe Entani,et al.  Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Adel Hatami Marbini Dual-Role Factors for Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis , 2017 .

[27]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Ki-Young Jeong,et al.  Cross efficiency based heuristics to rank decision making units in data envelopment analysis , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..