Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia

A central question in cognitive neuroscience is whether mechanisms exist that are specialized for particular domains. One of the most commonly cited examples of a domain-specific competence is the human ability to recognize upright faces. However, according to a widely discussed alternative hypothesis, face recognition is instead performed by mechanisms specialized for processing any object class for which an individual has expertise. Faces, according to this domain-general hypothesis, are just one example of an expert class. Nonface object expertise has been intensively investigated using a training procedure involving an artificial stimulus class known as greebles. A key prediction of this hypothesis is that individuals with face recognition impairments will also have impairments with other categories that control subjects have expertise with. Our results show that a man with severe prosopagnosia performed normally throughout the standard greeble training procedure. These findings indicate that face recognition and greeble recognition rely on separate mechanisms.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J Sergent,et al.  Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[14]  R. Pearson,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? , 2001, Neurocase.

[15]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Visual Recognition in a Developmental Agnosic: Evidence for Separate Developmental Processes , 2003, Neurocase.

[20]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[22]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[28]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .