The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem

Abstract A generalized Bloch sphere, in which the states of a quantum entity of arbitrary dimension are geometrically represented, is investigated and further extended, to also incorporate the measurements. This extended representation constitutes a general solution to the measurement problem, inasmuch it allows to derive the Born rule as an average over hidden-variables, describing not the state of the quantum entity, but its interaction with the measuring system. According to this modelization, a quantum measurement is to be understood, in general, as a tripartite process, formed by an initial deterministic decoherence-like process, a subsequent indeterministic collapse-like process, and a final deterministic purification-like process. We also show that quantum probabilities can be generally interpreted as the probabilities of a first-order non-classical theory, describing situations of maximal lack of knowledge regarding the process of actualization of potential interactions, during a measurement.

[1]  T. Kibble.  Causality and Chance in Modern Physics , 1984 .

[2]  B. Coecke.  Hidden measurement model for pure and mixed states of quantum physics in Euclidean space , 1995 .

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Origin of the Non-Classical Character of the Quantum Probability Model , 1987 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures due to fluctuations of the measurement situation , 1993 .

[5]  M. Schlosshauer.  Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.

[6]  Andrzej Kossakowski,et al.  The Bloch-Vector Space for N-Level Systems: the Spherical-Coordinate Point of View , 2005, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[7]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities , 2010, 1004.2531.

[8]  Diederik Aerts.  The Description of Joint Quantum Entities and the Formulation of a Paradox , 2000 .

[9]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[10]  Stanley Gudder,et al.  On Hidden-Variable Theories , 1970 .

[11]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Violation of Bell Inequalities in the Macroworld , 2000, quant-ph/0007044.

[12]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.

[13]  K. Życzkowski,et al.  Geometry of the Set of Mixed Quantum States: An Apophatic Approach , 2011, 1112.2347.

[14]  L. Broglie,et al.  Causality and chance in modern physics , 1984 .

[15]  Arvind,et al.  A generalized Pancharatnam geometric phase formula for three-level quantum systems , 1996, quant-ph/9605042.

[16]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  The Observer Effect , 2011, Foundations of Science.

[17]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts.  The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality , 1999 .

[19]  K. Lendi,et al.  Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications , 1987 .

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[21]  D. Aerts,et al.  The missing elements of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the E.P.R. paradox situation , 1984 .

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Towards a General Operational and Realistic Framework for Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory , 2005 .

[23]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability , 1994 .

[24]  B. Coecke.  Generalization of the proof on the existence of hidden measurements to experiments with an infinite set of outcomes , 1995 .

[25]  J. Eberly,et al.  N-Level Coherence Vector and Higher Conservation Laws in Quantum Optics and Quantum Mechanics , 1981 .

[26]  Diederik Aerts.  BEING AND CHANGE: FOUNDATIONS OF A REALISTIC OPERATIONAL FORMALISM , 2002 .

[27]  L. I. Ponomarev,et al.  The Quantum Dice , 2021 .

[28]  T. Fritz.  On infinite-dimensional state spaces , 2012, 1202.3817.

[29]  N. Khaneja,et al.  Characterization of the Positivity of the Density Matrix in Terms of the Coherence Vector Representation , 2003, quant-ph/0302024.

[30]  Diederik Aerts.  The Hidden Measurement Formalism: What Can Be Explained and Where Quantum Paradoxes Remain , 1998 .

[31]  B. Coecke.  A hidden measurement representation for quantum entities described by finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces , 1995 .

[32]  O. Lévêque,et al.  Classical and Quantum Probability in the ∈-Model , 1999 .

[33]  R. Jozsa,et al.  A Complete Classification of Quantum Ensembles Having a Given Density Matrix , 1993 .

[34]  Diederik Aerts.  Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature , 1995 .

[35]  G. Kimura.  The Bloch Vector for N-Level Systems , 2003, quant-ph/0301152.

[36]  H. Everett.  "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[37]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models , 2011, 1112.4045.

[38]  S. Aerts.  The Born Rule from a Consistency Requirement on Hidden Measurements in Complex Hilbert Space , 2002 .

[39]  M. Born.  Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[40]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery- view of reality 1 , 1998 .

[41]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  A remark on the role of indeterminism and non-locality in the violation of Bell’s inequalities , 2013, 1302.5826.

[42]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Hidden-Measurement Formalism: Quantum Mechanics as a Consequence of Fluctuations on the Measurement , 1997 .

[43]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[44]  K. Życzkowski,et al.  ON MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASES , 2010, 1004.3348.

[45]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic classical laboratory situation violating the Bell inequalities with 2-2 , 1991 .

[46]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[47]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[48]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Unreasonable Success of Quantum Probability I: Quantum Measurements as Uniform Fluctuations , 2014, 1401.2647.

[49]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Solving the hard problem of Bertrand's paradox , 2014, 1403.4139.

[50]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[51]  A. Gleason.  Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[52]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic macroscopic physical entity with a three-dimensional Hilbert space description , 2001 .

[53]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  The δ-Quantum Machine, the k-Model, and the Non-ordinary Spatiality of Quantum Entities , 2011, 1104.4738.

[54]  A. Smaling.  The Chatton-Ockham strategy; an alternative to the simplicity principle , 2005 .

[55]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[56]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  AN ATTEMPT TO IMAGINE PARTS OF THE REALITY OF THE MICRO-WORLD , 1990 .