Studying invasion: have we missed the boat?

Invasive species, and the ensuing homogenization of the world’s biota, form a global problem with consequences ranging from the decline and extirpation of native species to threats to human health. The magnitude of this issue demands a thorough understanding of the invasion process, which consists of three main stages: initial dispersal, establishment of self-sustaining populations, and spread. To assess the relative distribution of research effort among these stages, we conducted a literature review using 873 articles published in 23 major journals over the past 10 years. Of the 873 papers, only 96 (11.0%) studied initial dispersal, and only half of these (6.2% of the total) were empirical. As the first stage in a contingent process, we argue that initial dispersal is the best stage during which to direct management efforts. In addition, initial dispersal has direct relevance for fundamental ecological questions regarding community assembly and metacommunity dynamics. In so far that answering these questions and preventing invasion are goals of ecologists, the disparity in research effort noted here suggests that ecologists need to expand their efforts to include more research on initial dispersal.

[1]  C. Kolar,et al.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  T. Allen,et al.  Will similar forests develop on similar sites , 1985 .

[3]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION SPREAD: WHAT CAN WE FORECAST AND HOW WELL? , 2003 .

[4]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics : empirical and theoretical investigations , 1991 .

[5]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  N. Hairston,et al.  Population biology of a failed invasion: Paleolimnology of Daphnia exilis in upstate New York , 1999 .

[7]  J. Chapman,et al.  Live Seafood Species as Recipes for Invasion , 2003 .

[8]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Review Eradication: What Can Go Wrong Viewing Invasive Species Removal in a Whole-ecosystem Context , 2022 .

[9]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[10]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice , 1997 .

[12]  D. Ackerly Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[13]  T. Allen,et al.  Potential Corridors for the Rusty Crayfish, Orconectes Rusticus, in Northern Wisconsin (USA) Lakes: Lessons for Exotic Invasions , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[15]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Blowing in the wind: a field test of overland dispersal and colonization by aquatic invertebrates , 2002, Oecologia.

[16]  John R. Jones,et al.  ESTIMATING DISPERSAL FROM PATTERNS OF SPREAD: SPATIAL AND LOCAL CONTROL OF LAKE INVASIONS , 2002 .

[17]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[18]  W. Wilson,et al.  Coexistence of competitors in metacommunities due to spatial variation in resource growth rates; does R* predict the outcome of competition? , 2004 .

[19]  R. Hobbs,et al.  An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions , 1995 .

[20]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Simulated dispersal of exotic rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in a northern Wisconsin lake district and implications for management , 1999 .

[21]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[22]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence , 2004 .

[23]  J. Shurin DISPERSAL LIMITATION, INVASION RESISTANCE, AND THE STRUCTURE OF POND ZOOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES , 2000 .

[24]  G. Roderick,et al.  DISPERSAL OF INVERTEBRATES AMONG TEMPORARY PONDS: ARE GENETIC ESTIMATES ACCURATE? , 2001 .

[25]  D. Simberloff How Much Information on Population Biology Is Needed to Manage Introduced Species? , 2003 .

[26]  D. Lodge,et al.  Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  D. Lodge,et al.  An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  A. L. Buikema,et al.  Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function , 1998 .

[29]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[30]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Reid's Paradox of Rapid Plant Migration Dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records , 1998 .

[31]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[32]  S. H. Kay,et al.  Mail order, the Internet, and invasive aquatic weeds. , 2001 .

[33]  John W. Williams,et al.  DISSIMILARITY ANALYSES OF LATE-QUATERNARY VEGETATION AND CLIMATE IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2001 .

[34]  D. Lodge,et al.  Global hot spots of biological invasions: evaluating options for ballast–water management , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  C. Elton The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[36]  P. Warren The effects of between-habitat dispersal rate on protist communities and metacommunities in microcosms at two spatial scales , 2004, Oecologia.