The neuroecology of the elasmobranch electrosensory world: why peripheral morphology shapes behavior

The adaptations of elasmobranch sensory systems can be studied by linking the morphological structure with the natural behavior and ecology of the organism. This paper presents the first step in a ‘neuroecological’ approach to interpret the spatial arrangement of the electrosensory ampullary organs in elasmobranch fishes. A brief review of the structure and function of the ampullae of Lorenzini is provided for interpretation of the organ system morphology in relation to the detection of dipole and uniform electric fields. The spatial projections of canals from discrete ampullary clusters were determined for the barndoor skate, Raja laevis, based upon a published figure in Raschi (1986), and measured directly from the head of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. The dorsoventrally flattened body of the skate restricts the projections of long canals to the horizontal plane. There is a distinct difference between dorsal and ventral projection patterns in all groups. Notable within-cluster features include a relatively long canal subgroup in the dorsal superficial ophthalmic (SOd) and dorsal hyoid (HYOd) clusters that are oriented parallel (bidirectionally) to the longitudinal axis of the body. It is postulated that this subgroup of canals may be important for detection and orientation to weak uniform fields. Ventral canal projections in the skate are primarily lateral, with the exception of the hyoid (HYOv) that also projects medially. This wide dispersion may function for the detection of prey located below the body and pectoral fins of the skate, and may also be used for orientation behavior. The mandibular canals located near the margin of the lower jaw (of both study species) are ideally positioned for use during prey manipulation or capture, and possibly for interspecific courtship or biting. The head of the white shark, which lacks the hyoid clusters, is ovoid in cross section and thus ampullary canals can project into three-dimensional space. The SOd and superficial ophthalmic ventral (SOv) clusters show strong rostral, dorsal and lateral projection components, whereas the SOv also detects rostral fields under the snout. In the sagittal plane, the SOv and SOd have robust dorsal projections as well as ventral in the SOv. Most notable are canal projections in the white shark buccal (BUC) ampullary cluster, which has a radial turnstile configuration on the ventrolateral side of the snout. The turnstile design and tilt between orthogonal planes indicates the white shark BUC may function in detection of uniform fields, including magnetically induced electric fields that may be used in orientation behaviors. These data can be used in future neuroecology behavioral performance experiments to (1) test for possible specializations of cluster groups to different natural electric stimuli, (2) the possibility of specialized canal subgroups within a cluster, and (3) test several models of navigation that argue for the use of geomagnetically induced electric cues.

[1]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Inanimate and Animate Sources Other Than Electric Organs , 1974 .

[2]  Anne W. Schmidt,et al.  Somatotopy within the medullary electrosensory nucleus of the little skate, Raja erinacea , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  Kalmijn Aj,et al.  Electric and near-field acoustic detection, a comparative study. , 1997 .

[4]  Michael G. Paulin ELECTRORECEPTION AND THE COMPASS SENSE OF SHARKS , 1995 .

[5]  T. Tricas,et al.  Sensitivity and response dynamics of elasmobranch electrosensory primary afferent neurons to near threshold fields , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. , 1982, Science.

[7]  W. Alevizon,et al.  Prey discrimination and electroreception in the stingray Dasyatis sabina , 1988 .

[8]  D. J. Long CHAPTER 27 – White Shark Predation and Scavenging on Cetaceans in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean , 1996 .

[9]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  The electric sense of sharks and rays. , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  John C. Montgomery Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray , 1984 .

[11]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course , 1990 .

[12]  M. Levine Great White Sharks , 1998 .

[13]  T. Tricas,et al.  Response properties and biological function of the skate electrosensory system during ontogeny , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Liana Bolis,et al.  Comparative physiology of sensory systems , 1984 .

[15]  A. Klimley CHAPTER 16 – The Behavior of White Sharks and Their Pinniped Prey during Predatory Attacks , 1996 .

[16]  Perspectives on the ecomorphology of bony fishes , 1995 .

[17]  J. Mitchell,et al.  VI.—On the Lateral Sense Organs of Elasmobranchs. II. The Sensory Canals of the Common Skate (Raia batis) , 1895, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[18]  P. Motta,et al.  Trophic consequences of differential performance: ontogeny of oral jaw‐crushing performance in the sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus (Teleostei, Sparidae) , 1997 .

[19]  R. Hueter Adaptations for spatial vision in sharks , 1990 .

[20]  W. Raschi A morphological analysis of the ampullae of Lorenzini in selected skates (Pisces, Rajoidei) , 1986, Journal of morphology.

[21]  R. W. Murray,et al.  The response of the ampullae of Lorenzini of elasmobranchs to electrical stimulation. , 1962, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  W. R. Strong CHAPTER 37 – Population Dynamics of White Sharks in Spencer Gulf, South Australia , 1996 .

[23]  J. Sisneros,et al.  Electrosensory optimization to conspecific phasic signals for mating , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  T. Tricas,et al.  Predatory behavior of the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) with notes on its biology , 1984 .

[25]  P. Wainwright,et al.  Morphological and functional bases of durophagy in the queen triggerfish, Balistes vetula (Pisces, tetraodontiformes) , 1993, Journal of morphology.

[26]  A. Klimley,et al.  Highly directional swimming by scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini, and subsurface irradiance, temperature, bathymetry, and geomagnetic field , 1993 .

[27]  D. Nelson,et al.  DIEL BEHAVIOR OF THE BLUE SHARK, PRIONACE GLAUCA, NEAR SANTA CATALINA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 1 , 1977 .

[28]  Timothy C. Tricas Bioelectric-Mediated Predation by Swell Sharks, Cephaloscyllium ventriosum , 1982 .

[29]  H. Norris,et al.  The distribution and innervation of the ampullae of lorenzini of the dogfish, squalus acanthias. Some comparisons with conditions in other plagiostomes and corrections of prevalent errors , 1929 .

[30]  A. Lamont XII.—The Lateral Sense Organs of Elasmobranchs: The Ampullary Canals of the Genus Raia. , 1917, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[31]  S. Moss Feeding Mechanisms in Sharks , 1977 .

[32]  R. W. Murray,et al.  Electrical Sensitivity of the Ampullæ of Lorenzini , 1960, Nature.

[33]  M. Westneat Phylogenetic systematics and biomechanics in ecomorphology , 1995 .