Removal of nickel from aqueous solution by low-cost clay adsorbents

Laboratory experiments were performed to investigate the effectiveness of natural clay deposits as a potential low cost adsorbent for the removal of nickel (Ni) from wastewater. Two types of natural local clays deposits collected from Al-Mhawes Mountain, Al-Kharg prefecture and Khulais, Jeddah prefecture were examined for their abilities to remove Ni from wastewater. The effects of Ni concentrations, amount of clay added and pH of the solution on Ni adsorption were studied. The mobility of Ni and its specification were examined in a column experiment under graduate levels of clay deposits (0, 3, 6 and 9 %) and increasing Ni concentration (0, 5, and 10 mg L -1 ) was examined. The Ni adsorption was found to be higher in the Khulais clay due to its relatively higher cation exchange capacity and specific surface area compared to Al-Mahwes clay sample. The maximum Ni adsorption capacity was observed ranges from 0.036 to 0.090 mg g -1 . The highest binding energy constant was obtained in case of Khulais clay deposit (1428 L g -1 ). The adsorption data followed Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms and correlation coefficients (R 2 ) ranged from 0.90 to 0.99. Column studies results showed that 92-99% of the added Ni was retained in the top soil layer (0-5 cm).The results indicated that local natural clay deposits were capable of removing Ni from wastewater at cost-effective and efficient adsorbent materials in Saudi Arabia.

[1]  Y. Hannachi,et al.  Adsorption of Nickel from aqueous solution by the use of low-cost adsorbents , 2009 .

[2]  K. Adebowale,et al.  Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions onto sodium tetraborate-modified Kaolinite clay: Equilibrium and thermodynamic studies , 2008 .

[3]  F. Khalili,et al.  Effects of pH and Temperature on the Interaction of Pb(II) with Azraq Humic Acid Studied with Schubert's Ion Exchange Method , 2007 .

[4]  K. Adebowale,et al.  The effect of some operating variables on the adsorption of lead and cadmium ions on kaolinite clay. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  J. C. Casagrande,et al.  Nickel adsorption by soils in relation to pH, organic matter, and iron oxides , 2004 .

[6]  J. Enzweiler,et al.  Evaluation of heavy metal removal from aqueous solution onto scolecite. , 2002, Water research.

[7]  T. Henmi,et al.  ADSORPTION MECHANISMS OF COPPER AND ZINC ON NANO-BALL ALLOPHANE , 2002 .

[8]  S. Singh,et al.  Heavy metal interactions with phosphatic clay: sorption and desorption behavior. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[9]  M. McBride Environmental Chemistry of Soils , 1994 .

[10]  A. Pukite,et al.  METAL MOVEMENT IN SLUDGE‐AMENDED SOILS: A NINE‐YEAR STUDY , 1987 .

[11]  A. Pukite,et al.  METAL MOVEMENT IN SLUDGE‐TREATED SOILS AFTER SIX YEARS OF SLUDGE ADDITION: 2. NICKEL, COBALT, IRON, MANGANESE, CHROMIUM, AND MERCURY , 1985 .

[12]  A. Pukite,et al.  METAL MOVEMENT IN SLUDGE‐TREATED SOILS AFTER SIX YEARS OF SLUDGE ADDITION: 1. CADMIUM, COPPER, LEAD, AND ZINC , 1984 .

[13]  J. Street,et al.  Adsorption of Cadmium on Soil Constituents in the Presence of Complexing Ligands , 1981 .

[14]  R. Chaney,et al.  Zinc, cadmium, and manganese uptake by soybean from two zinc- and cadmium-amended Coastal Plain soils. , 1980 .

[15]  S. Prajapati Biomonitoring and speciation of road dust for heavy metals using Calotropis procera and Delbergia sissoo , 2012 .

[16]  M. H. Sayadi,et al.  Variations in the heavy metal accumulations within the surface soils from the Chitgar industrial area of Tehran , 2011 .

[17]  F. Alsewailem,et al.  Saudi Arabian clays for lead removal in wastewater. , 2009 .

[18]  J. C. Casagrande,et al.  Zinc adsorption in highly weathered soils , 2008 .

[19]  T. Henmi,et al.  Charge Characteristics of Nano-Ball Allophane as Affected by Zinc Adsorption , 2007 .

[20]  N. Uren Forms, Reactions, and Availability of Nickel in Soils , 1992 .

[21]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  The surface chemistry of soils , 1984 .