Misbinding of color and motion in human early visual cortex: Evidence from event-related potentials

One of the central tasks for the visual system is to integrate visual features into objects, which is referred to as the binding problem. To study the binding mechanisms, it has been suggested to use phenomena of feature misbinding to separate active feature binding from feature co-occurence. Taking advantage of a steady-state misbinding of color and motion, we performed psychophysical and event-related potential (ERP) adaptation experiments to investigate the neural mechanisms of the misbinding (i.e., the active color-motion binding). Human subjects adapted to the misbinding of color and motion, as well as their correct binding that was used for identifying neural processes associated with the co-occurrence of color and motion. We found that adaptation to the misbinding and the correct binding could generate color-contingent motion aftereffects (CCMAEs), but in opposite directions. ERP adaptation effects manifested in the earliest ERP component C1. The C1 latency in the misbinding condition was 11ms longer than that in the correct binding condition. In the correct binding condition, the C1 adaptation effect (i.e., the C1 amplitude reduction after adaptation) took place in the peak phase of the C1. The dipole source of the adaptation effect was located in V1. In the misbinding condition, the C1 adaptation effect occurred in the descending phase of the C1 and its dipole source was in V2. In both conditions, the C1 adaptation effects correlated with the CCMAEs across individual subjects. These findings provide human electrophysiological evidence that active feature binding takes place in early visual cortex, but at later processing stages than feature co-occurrence.

[1]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Input to V2 Thin Stripes Arises from V1 Cytochrome Oxidase Patches , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Binding of motion and colour is early and automatic , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Movement aftereffects contingent on color, intensity, and pattern , 1972 .

[7]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Illusory Contour Processing: Combined High-Density Electrical Mapping, Source Analysis, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Michael Bach,et al.  Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  K R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Processing of color, form, and motion in macaque area V2 , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Whitney Neuroscience: Toward Unbinding the Binding Problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[13]  John C Gore,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Zeki,et al.  The architecture of the colour centre in the human visual brain: new results and a review * , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Vision: Steady-state misbinding of colour and motion , 2004, Nature.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Probing Unconscious Visual Processing with the McCollough Effect , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The Coding of Color, Motion, and Their Conjunction in the Human Visual Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Yingchen He,et al.  Attention-Dependent Early Cortical Suppression Contributes to Crowding , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Relationship between visual binding, reentry and awareness , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Temporal Resolution for the Perception of Features and Conjunctions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Semir Zeki,et al.  Feature binding in the feedback layers of area V2. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Visual Feature Binding Requires Reentry , 2010, Psychological science.

[26]  H. Tamura,et al.  Less Segregated Processing of Visual Information in V2 than in V1 of the Monkey Visual Cortex , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Fang Fang,et al.  Misbinding of Color and Motion in Human Visual Cortex , 2014, Current Biology.

[28]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  L. Robertson Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[34]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  Neural Activities in V1 Create a Bottom-Up Saliency Map , 2012, Neuron.

[35]  C F Stromeyer,et al.  Contour-contingent color aftereffects: retinal area specificity. , 1972, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  J. Bullier,et al.  Feedforward and feedback connections between areas V1 and V2 of the monkey have similar rapid conduction velocities. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  D. Guthrie,et al.  Significance testing of difference potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[38]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[39]  Vincent Di Lollo The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. , 2012, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[40]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Visual feature binding: The critical time windows of V1/V2 and parietal activity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[42]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.