Evaluation of leaf deposit quality between electrostatic and conventional multi-row sprayers in a trellised vineyard

Abstract Spray application technologies for specialty crops have developed considerably in recent years with regard to improved control, reduced cost, and ability to avoid environmental contamination. For example, new developments in electrostatic sprayers have been progressively introduced as an alternative for vineyard spray applications. This study investigated the efficiency of this emerging technology in a Spanish trellis vineyard. First, a complete characterization of an electrostatic sprayer was conducted under laboratory conditions. The liquid flow rate was measured using different restrictor configurations to obtain the outgoing air velocities in the diffusers. Second, field trials were conducted in a vineyard testing, two forward speeds (5.9 and 4.7 km h−1, resulting in volume rates of 60 and 75 l ha−1, respectively) and the activated or deactivated electrostatic system. Tartrazine was used as a tracer material to evaluate the spray quality over the canopy. These results were compared with similar trials using a standard multi-row sprayer with orientable outputs at 5.9 km h−1 and 190 l ha−1. The results indicated that activated electrostatic treatments resulted in a greater amount of deposition on vegetation than the other trials. The activated system also produced a significant correlation between leaf deposition and forward speed (p ≤ 0.05). The most homogeneous results were achieved by the activated electrostatic sprayer at 5.9 km h−1 and the reference sprayer. These results suggest that electrostatic sprayers could save up to 68% of applied volume with similar or better deposition of the liquid and achieve homogeneity over the whole canopy.

[1]  E. Gil,et al.  Advances in developing a new test method to assess spray drift potential from air blast sprayers , 2017 .

[2]  Soo-Young No,et al.  Development of electrostatic pressure-swirl nozzle for agricultural applications , 2003 .

[3]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Comparative study of CFD models of the air flow produced by an air-assisted sprayer adapted to the crop geometry , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[4]  Feng Luo,et al.  Droplet impingement behavior analysis on the leaf surface of Shu-ChaZao under different pesticide formulations , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[5]  W. Siegfried,et al.  Comparison of spray deposits and efficacy against powdery mildew of aerial and ground-based spraying equipment in viticulture , 2003 .

[6]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Impact of Electrostatic and Conventional Sprayers Characteristics on Dispersion of Barrier Spray1 , 2010, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[7]  S E Law,et al.  Embedded- Electrode Electrostatic-Induction Spray-Charging Nozzle: Theoretical and Engineering Design , 1978 .

[8]  P. J. Walklate,et al.  An examination of Leaf-Wall-Area dose expression , 2012 .

[9]  A. Adams,et al.  Influence of droplet size, air-assistance and electrostatic charge upon the distribution of ultra-low-volume sprays on tomatoes , 1987 .

[10]  A. Yule,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURAL AIR-ATOMIZED SPRAYS AND DEPOSITION, PART I: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 2005 .

[11]  Manoj Kumar Patel,et al.  Technological improvements in electrostatic spraying and its impact to agriculture during the last decade and future research perspectives – A review , 2016 .

[12]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  A HISTORY OF AIR-BLAST SPRAYER DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE PROSPECTS , 2008 .

[13]  G. Pergher,et al.  The Effect of Spray Application Rate and Airflow Rate on Foliar Deposition in a Hedgerow Vineyard , 1995 .

[14]  A. Yarin Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing ... , 2006 .

[15]  Spray drift reduction techniques for vineyards in fragmented landscapes. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Texto Consolidado,et al.  Real Decreto 1311/2012, de 14 de septiembre, por el que se establece el marco de actuación para conseguir un uso sostenible de los productos fitosanitarios , 2016 .

[17]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  An advance air-induced air-assisted electrostatic nozzle with enhanced performance , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[18]  Luca Palmeri,et al.  An integrated model-based approach to the risk assessment of pesticide drift from vineyards , 2015 .

[19]  P Balsari,et al.  Developing strategies to reduce spray drift in pneumatic spraying in vineyards: Assessment of the parameters affecting droplet size in pneumatic spraying. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Scott L. Post,et al.  A review of the effects of droplet size and flow rate on the chargeability of spray droplets in electrostatic agricultural sprays. , 2018 .

[21]  Emilio Gil Moya Metodología y criterios para la selección y evaluación de equipos de aplicación de fitosanitarios para la viña , 2001 .

[22]  T. Mahalingam,et al.  Optimization of spray deposition parameters for the formation of single-phase tin sulfide thin films , 2014 .

[23]  J. Llorens,et al.  Field validation of dosaviña, a decision support system to determine the optimal volume rate for pesticide application in vineyards , 2011 .

[24]  A. J. Arnold,et al.  Biological effectiveness of electrostatically charged rotary atomisers..: I. Trials on field beans and barley, 1981 , 1984 .

[25]  H. Zhu,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF APPLICATION VARIABLES AND PLANT DENSITY FOR BELL PEPPER PEST MANAGEMENT , 2007 .

[26]  Song Jianli,et al.  Precision orchard sprayer based on automatically infrared target detecting and electrostatic spraying techniques , 2011 .

[27]  G. Pergher,et al.  RECOVERY RATE OF TRACER DYES USED FOR SPRAY DEPOSIT ASSESSMENT , 2001 .

[28]  A. Escolà,et al.  Variable rate dosing in precision viticulture: use of electronic devices to improve application efficiency. , 2010 .

[29]  C. Ghanshyam,et al.  Electrostatic hand pressure knapsack spray system with enhanced performance for small scale farms , 2013 .

[30]  Gile,et al.  Variable rate sprayer. Part 2 - Vineyard prototype , 2013 .

[31]  Galo Canizares A History , 2018, Thresholds.

[32]  Devanand Maski,et al.  Effects of electrode voltage, liquid flow rate, and liquid properties on spray chargeability of an air-assisted electrostatic-induction spray-charging system , 2010 .

[33]  E. C. Hislop,et al.  Experimental air-assisted electrohydrodynamic spraying , 1994 .

[34]  M. Sidahmed ANALYTICAL COMPARISON OF FORCE AND ENERGY BALANCE METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZING SPRAYS FROM HYDRAULIC NOZZLES , 1998 .

[35]  C. G. Raetano,et al.  Optimization of spray deposition and Tetranychus urticae control with air assisted and electrostatic sprayer , 2017 .

[36]  S. Edward Law,et al.  Agricultural electrostatic spray application: a review of significant research and development during the 20th century , 2001 .

[37]  Gianfranco Pergher,et al.  Influence of canopy development in the vineyard on spray deposition from a tunnel sprayer , 2018 .

[38]  G. M. Richardson,et al.  Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 3. Effects of air volumetric flow rate , 2001 .

[39]  Emilio Gil,et al.  DOSAVIÑA: Tool to calculate the optimal volume rate and pesticide amount in vineyard spray applications based on a modified leaf wall area method , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[40]  M. A. Montoya,et al.  Evaluación de un panel para recuperación de deriva en aplicaciones fitosanitarias en viñedos , 2016 .

[41]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Ground Deposition and Airborne Spray Drift Assessment in Vineyard and Orchard: The Influence of Environmental Variables and Sprayer Settings , 2017 .

[42]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Design of a Decision Support Method to Determine Volume Rate for Vineyard Spraying , 2009 .

[43]  M. Bolda,et al.  Evaluating the potential utility of an electrostatic sprayer and a tractor-mounted vacuum machine for Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) management in California's coastal strawberry , 2018, Crop Protection.

[44]  Simone Pascuzzi,et al.  Spray deposition in “tendone” vineyards when using a pneumatic electrostatic sprayer , 2015 .

[45]  Yves Brunet,et al.  Atmospheric loss of pesticides above an artificial vineyard during air-assisted spraying , 2007 .

[46]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Nozzle Classification for Drift Reduction in Orchard Spraying; Identification of Drift Reduction Class Threshold Nozzles , 2008 .

[47]  Jorge Torres-Sánchez,et al.  3-D Characterization of Vineyards Using a Novel UAV Imagery-Based OBIA Procedure for Precision Viticulture Applications , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[48]  W. Siegfried,et al.  Dosage of plant protection products adapted to leaf area index in viticulture , 2007 .

[49]  J. Cunha,et al.  Spray deposition on coffee leaves from airblast sprayers with and without electrostatic charge = Depósito de calda aplicada em folhas de cafeeiro promovida pela pulverização hidropneumática com e sem carga eletrostática , 2015 .

[51]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Dynamic evaluation of airflow stream generated by a reverse system of an axial fan sprayer using 3D-ultrasonic anemometers. Effect of canopy structure , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[52]  Shaoxing Zhao,et al.  Factors affecting deposition in electrostatic pesticide spraying , 2008 .

[53]  E. L. Periago,et al.  Procedure for the measurement of soil inputs of plant-protection agents washed off through vineyard canopy by rainfall. , 2003 .

[54]  M. A. Montoya,et al.  Evaluación de un panel para recuperación de deriva en aplicaciones fitosanitarias en viñedos - Evaluation of a drift recovery panel for phytosanitary treatments in vineyards , 2016 .

[55]  Jordi Llorens,et al.  Variable rate sprayer. Part 2 - Vineyard prototype: Design, implementation, and validation , 2013 .

[56]  G. C. Scott,et al.  A review of the performance of electrostatically charged rotary atomisers on different crops , 1984 .

[57]  D. Giles,et al.  Electrostatic sprayers improve pesticide efficacy in greenhouses , 1995 .

[58]  Reza Ehsani,et al.  Technical Note: Spray Pattern Investigation of an Axial-Fan Airblast Precision Sprayer Using a Modified Vertical Patternator , 2012 .

[59]  Paulo Marcos de Barros Monteiro,et al.  Parameters of electrostatic spraying and its influence on the application efficiency , 2013 .