Sex differences in the neural correlates of child facial resemblance: an event-related fMRI study

Detection of genetic relatedness (i.e. kinship) impacts the social, parental, and sexual behavior of many species. In humans, self-referent phenotype matching based on facial resemblance may indicate kinship. For example, faces that resemble ours are perceived as more trustworthy and attractive. Sex differences in behavioral reactions to facial resemblance among children have also been demonstrated and are consistent with evolutionary theory suggesting that resemblance might serve as a paternity cue. Using event-related fMRI, we show that specific regions of the brain are implicated in processing facial resemblance and a sex difference in cortical response to facial resemblance expressed in children. We found a consistent activation in the fusiform gyrus across all face conditions, which is consistent with previous research on face processing. There were no sex differences in overall response to faces in the fusiform gyrus, and also to faces that did not resemble subjects. When resemblance was not modeled, females showed greater activation to child faces than males. Consistent with parental investment theory and theories of sexual selection, males showed greater cortical activity than females in response to children's faces that resembled them. These data suggest natural selection may have crafted a sexually differentiated neuro-sensory module implicated in detection of facial resemblance that may serve as a kin detection and paternity cue. This process may capitalize on neural substrates involved in self-referent processing and familiarity detection.

[1]  N. Ramnani,et al.  Distinct portions of anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex are activated by reward processing in separable phases of decision-making cognition , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  P. Benson,et al.  Recognizing one's own face , 2001, Cognition.

[3]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Degueldre,et al.  The Functional Anatomy of Inhibition Processes Investigated with the Hayling Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[7]  J. Ott,et al.  Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. , 1994, Human heredity.

[8]  P. Benson,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  S. Platek,et al.  Monkeys, mirrors, mark tests and minds. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  B. Sykes,et al.  Surnames and the Y chromosome. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin Recognition by Phenotype Matching , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[13]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[14]  Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford,et al.  Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: a preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity , 2005 .

[15]  Susan Carey,et al.  Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[16]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Neurology: Self-recognition and the right hemisphere , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Lisa M. DeBruine,et al.  Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women , 2004 .

[18]  Platek Female Infidelity and Paternal Uncertainty , 2006 .

[19]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Four Little Books about Evolution@@@Neanderthal, Bandits and Farmers: How Agriculture Really Began@@@Shaping Life: Genes, Embryos and Evolution@@@Divided Labours: An Evolutionary View of Women at Work@@@The Truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love , 1999 .

[20]  Margo Wilson,et al.  Whom are newborn babies said to resemble , 1982 .

[21]  R. Kawashima,et al.  Passive and Active Recognition of One's Own Face , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  P. Sherman,et al.  Decision making and recognition mechanisms , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  M. Bekoff,et al.  Reflections on animal selves. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences , 2002, Human nature.

[26]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan , 1993 .

[27]  R. Davidson Emotion and affective style: physiological substrates , 1997 .

[28]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Cortical Activations during judgments about the self and an other person , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  L. DeBruine Facial resemblance enhances trust , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  P. Sherman,et al.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[32]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance , 2003 .

[33]  G. Gallup,et al.  Let ’ s Face It A review of The Face in the Mirror : The Search for the Origins of Consciousness , 2003 .

[34]  J. Silk,et al.  True paternal care in a multi-male primate society , 2003, Nature.

[35]  G. Gallup,et al.  Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  Ellen Leibenluft,et al.  Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  State anger and prefrontal brain activity: evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Gallup,et al.  Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[39]  Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford,et al.  Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition , 2002 .

[40]  M. Bellis,et al.  Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation and Infidelity , 1999 .

[41]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains , 2004 .

[42]  G. Shulman,et al.  Role of medial prefrontal cortex in a default mode of brain function , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  Altruism, Dispersal, and Phenotype‐Matching Kin Recognition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[45]  G. Gallup,et al.  The human penis as a semen displacement device , 2003 .

[46]  Kosha Ruparel,et al.  Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self‐face from personally familiar faces , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[47]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[49]  G. Gallup,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Resemblance affects males more than females , 2002 .

[50]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[52]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[54]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Differential amygdalar response to novel versus newly familiar neutral faces: a functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.