Models of pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections

The traditional approach to reduce accidents at intersections has been to install traffic control devices. However, it has not been established that installation of such devices as signals, signs, or pavement markings, substantially improves pedestrian safety. On the contrary, empirical investigations have indicated that these devices tend to create a false sense of security. The major criteria used in installing these devices are vehicular volumes, pedestrian volumes, and engineering judgment. The compliance with these devices is, however, dependent on the pedestrian behavior. It is therefore necessary to study the crossing behavior, not only to realize the full benefits of signalization, but also to develop and evaluate new strategies to deal with the pedestrians. This report focuses on the crossing behavior of pedestrians at traffic signalised intersections. Since a non-compliant pedestrian attempting to cross on a "don't walk "phase looks for gaps in the traffic stream, the gap-acceptance theory is used to model the crossing maneuver. An inconsistent behavior model is assumed wherein the critical gap is treated as a random quantity varying both within and across individuals. Four possible crossing modes are identified, but only two could be studied because of sample size restrictions. Group interactions are incorporated in the models, as the behavior of individual pedestrians within the group may not be independent. Also, the pedestrians within the group may not be independent. Moreover, the pedestrian push-button choice behavior is integrated with the gap-acceptance models, as these two behaviors are correlated. Models are developed in the framework of random utility maximization theory using a multinomial probit approach. A data collection methodology was developed using a stratified sampling approach, with land use as the exogenous variable. The procedure was applied to selected intersections from the city of Austin, Texas. On-site surveys were conducted to obtain information on the behavior using a video recording technique. The calibration package used applies the Monte Carlo simulation technique to compute the choice probabilities, and obtains maximum likelihood estimates for the model parameters.

[1]  Sherrie A. Jones,et al.  ISSUES OF ELDERLY PEDESTRIANS , 1992 .

[2]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  Using gap sequences to estimate gap acceptance functions , 1981 .

[3]  Olusegun Adebisi,et al.  INFLUENCE OF STOPPED DELAY ON DRIVER GAP ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR , 1989 .

[4]  C. Daganzo Estimation of gap acceptance parameters within and across the population from direct roadside observation , 1981 .

[5]  Olusegun Adebisi,et al.  Driver Gap Acceptance Phenomena , 1982 .

[6]  J. Tanner,et al.  THE DELAY TO PEDESTRIANS CROSSING A ROAD , 1951 .

[7]  Irit Hocherman,et al.  SAFETY OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1987 .

[8]  Michael J Cynecki DEVELOPMENT OF CONFLICTS ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS , 1980 .

[9]  M F Roddin,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE BENEFITS OF SEPARATING PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES , 1978 .

[10]  P H Fleig,et al.  A STUDY OF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY BEHAVIOR USING ACTIVITY SAMPLING , 1967 .

[11]  Charles Zegeer,et al.  EFFECT OF PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS AND SIGNAL TIMING ON PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS , 1982 .

[12]  Everett C Carter,et al.  THE SAFETY, OPERATIONAL, AND COST IMPACTS OF PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1984 .

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[14]  V F Hurdle,et al.  GAP ACCEPTANCE: MYTH AND REALITY , 1983 .

[15]  R. Ashworth,et al.  Factors Affecting the Variability of Driver Gap-Acceptance Behaviour , 1978 .

[16]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Multinomial Probit with Time-Series Data: Unifying State Dependence and Serial Correlation Models , 1982 .

[17]  L Ellis King,et al.  PEDESTRIAN GAP-ACCEPTANCE , 1970 .

[18]  K S Opiela,et al.  PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN SUBURBAN AND DEVELOPING RURAL AREAS: RESEARCH REPORT , 1987 .

[19]  Thomas H Maze A PROBABILISTIC MODEL OF GAP ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR , 1981 .

[20]  James M Witkowski,et al.  ACCIDENT TYPE DESIGNATIONS AND LAND USE DATA IN PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT ANALYSIS (ABRIDGMENT) , 1988 .

[21]  A E Radwan,et al.  GAP ACCEPTANCE AND DELAY AT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS ON MULTI-LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAYS , 1980 .

[22]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  EFFECTS OF PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS ON SAFETY, OPERATIONS, AND PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOR--LITERATURE REVIEW , 1982 .

[23]  George H. Weiss,et al.  Comments on the Highway-Crossing Problem , 1961 .

[24]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting. , 1980 .

[25]  Nagui M. Rouphail MIDBLOCK CROSSWALKS: A USER COMPLIANCE AND PREFERENCE STUDY , 1984 .

[26]  P Gårder,et al.  Pedestrian safety at traffic signals: a study carried out with the help of a traffic conflicts technique. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.