Fossil fuel energy has several externalities not accounted for in the retail price, including associated adverse human health impacts, future costs from climate change, and other environmental damages. Here, we quantify the economic value of health impacts associated with PM(2.5) and PM(2.5) precursors (NO(x) and SO(2)) on a per kilowatt hour basis. We provide figures based on state electricity profiles, national averages and fossil fuel type. We find that the economic value of improved human health associated with avoiding emissions from fossil fuel electricity in the United States ranges from a low of $0.005-$0.013/kWh in California to a high of $0.41-$1.01/kWh in Maryland. When accounting for the adverse health impacts of imported electricity, the California figure increases to $0.03-$0.07/kWh. Nationally, the average economic value of health impacts associated with fossil fuel usage is $0.14-$0.35/kWh. For coal, oil, and natural gas, respectively, associated economic values of health impacts are $0.19-$0.45/kWh, $0.08-$0.19/kWh, and $0.01-$0.02/kWh. For coal and oil, these costs are larger than the typical retail price of electricity, demonstrating the magnitude of the externality. When the economic value of health impacts resulting from air emissions is considered, our analysis suggests that on average, U.S. consumers of electricity should be willing to pay $0.24-$0.45/kWh for alternatives such as energy efficiency investments or emission-free renewable sources that avoid fossil fuel combustion. The economic value of health impacts is approximately an order of magnitude larger than estimates of the social cost of carbon for fossil fuel electricity. In total, we estimate that the economic value of health impacts from fossil fuel electricity in the United States is $361.7-886.5 billion annually, representing 2.5-6.0% of the national GDP.
[1]
M. Auffhammer.
Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use
,
2011,
Environmental Health Perspectives.
[2]
William D. Nordhaus,et al.
Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy
,
2011
.
[3]
R. Burnett,et al.
Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.
,
2002,
JAMA.
[4]
Lisa Conner,et al.
Expert judgment assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S.
,
2008,
Environmental science & technology.
[5]
J. Schwartz,et al.
Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study.
,
2006,
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[6]
Bryan J. Hubbell,et al.
The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution
,
2009,
Air quality, atmosphere, & health.
[7]
Ventura River Reaches.
Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency
,
2012
.
[8]
Ari Rabl,et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT OF AIR POLLUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ENERGY SYSTEM
,
2000
.