Exogenous/Endogenous Control of Space-based/ Object-based Attention: Four Types of Visual Selection?

Attention can be directed to an object or to a location, and in a bottom-up or in a top-down fashion. The two dimensions of visual attention have elicited separate lines of research that bypassed the possibility of interactions. In the present paper, the relation between the two dimensions is explored from the initial assumption that they refer to independent aspects. If so, four types of visual selection should appear: exogenous/endogenous control of space-based/object-based attention. Examples of three of the four types are readily found in the literature, but expecting an object does not seem to affect visual selection. Therefore, endogenous control of objectbased attention may not be possible, suggesting that the two dimensions of visual attention are interdependent and require a more integrative theoretical framework. However, research to date may not have provided adequate tests to observe benefits from expecting objects. Three issues remain open: the representation from which object-based selection...

[1]  G R Mangun,et al.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. Henderson.  Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[5]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[7]  James F. Juola,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Central, Peripheral, and Abrupt-onset Cues in Visual Attention , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology , 1993 .

[10]  John R. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and visual attention , 1985 .

[11]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[12]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[14]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Theeuwes.  Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.

[16]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[17]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[18]  J. Henderson,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[21]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective encoding from multielement visual displays , 1973 .

[22]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Object-Centered Neglect in Patients with Unilateral Neglect: Effects of Left-Right Coordinates of Objects , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Kahneman.  Changing views of attention and automacy , 1984 .

[24]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[26]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Findlay,et al.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  D. Homa,et al.  Reallocation of visual attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[34]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[35]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[37]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Object-centred orienting of attention , 1995 .

[39]  A F Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  S J Luck,et al.  Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  J. Theeuwes.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  T H Carr,et al.  Automaticity and cognitive anatomy: is word recognition "automatic"? , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[49]  M. Goodale.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1995 .

[50]  F. Wilkinson,et al.  Distractor Ratio and Grouping Processes in Visual Conjunction Search , 1992, Perception.

[51]  Don R. Lyon,et al.  A Framework for Understanding the Allocation of Attention in Location-Precued Discrimination , 1994 .

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[53]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  14. Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform conneectedness , 1996 .

[54]  H. Egeth,et al.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  J. Stolz,et al.  Exogenous orienting does not reflect an encapsulated set of processes. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[57]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996 .

[58]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  Michiel P. van Oeffelen,et al.  An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity , 1983, Pattern Recognit..

[62]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate , 1994 .

[63]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  E. William Yund,et al.  Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[67]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[68]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  A H van der Heijden,et al.  Enhancing Single-Item Recognition Accuracy by Cueing Spatial Locations in Vision , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[70]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[75]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[76]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[77]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[78]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[80]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[82]  M. Cheal,et al.  Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[84]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[86]  J. Henderson,et al.  Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[87]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention , 1984 .

[88]  G. Logan.  The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.

[89]  H. Pashler,et al.  Negligible Effect of Spatial Precuing on Identification of Single Digits , 1994 .

[90]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[91]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[92]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[93]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[94]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[95]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[96]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[97]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[98]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[99]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[100]  J F Juola,et al.  Control of attention around the fovea. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[101]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[102]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[103]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[105]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[106]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[107]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[108]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[109]  P. Merikle,et al.  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[110]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[111]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal course of selective attention. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[112]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[113]  J. Riddoch,et al.  13. Competitive mechanisms of selection by space and object: a neuropsychological approach , 1996 .

[114]  G. Logan.  Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[115]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  Principles of feature integration in visual perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[116]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[117]  P. G. Vos,et al.  Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups , 1982, Memory & cognition.