Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition

Two experiments were carried out to investigate the roles of joint accent structure and familiarity in delayed recognition of relatively long tonal melodies. Melodic themes of target melodies were defined by correlating contour-related pitch accents with temporal accents (accent coupling) during an initial familiarization phase. Later, subjects gave recognition responses to key-transposed versions of the target melodies as well as to decoys withsame anddifferent contour accent patterns. In Experiment 1, all to-be-recognized melodies occurred both in an original rhythm, which preserved accent coupling, and in a new rhythm, which did not. Listeners were best at distinguishing targets fromdifferent decoys, especially in the original rhythm. In Experiment 2, the familiarity of target tunes and the rhythmic similarity in recognition were varied.Similar rhythms preserved accent coupling, whereasdissimilar rhythms did not. Listeners were most adept in distinguishing familiar targets fromdifferent decoys (Experiment 2A), particularly when they appeared in novel but similar rhythms. However, insimilar rhythm conditions, listeners also frequently mistooksame decoys for targets. With less familiar targets (Experiment 2B), these effects were attenuated, and performance showed general effects of pitch contour.

[1]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does? , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  David C. Rubin,et al.  Characteristics and constraints in ballads and their effects on memory , 1991 .

[3]  Richard J. Jagacinski,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of signal detection confidence ratings , 1977 .

[4]  Walter J Dowling,et al.  Rhythmic groups and subjective chunks in memory for melodies , 1973 .

[5]  Stephen Handel,et al.  Using Polyrhythms to Study Rhythm , 1984 .

[6]  C Palmer,et al.  Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Roger A. Kendall,et al.  The effect of melodic and temporal contour on recognition memory for pitch change , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M R Jones,et al.  Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Peter Essens,et al.  Perception of Temporal Patterns , 1985 .

[10]  J G Martin,et al.  Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. , 1972, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Bartlett,et al.  PSYCHOMUSICOLOGY Spring 1981 THE IMPORTANCE OF 'INTERVAL INFORMATION IN LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR MELODIES , 1981 .

[12]  D. Povel,et al.  Accents in equitone sequences , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Massaro,et al.  Cross-octave masking of single tones and musical sequences: The effects of structure on auditory recognition , 1976 .

[15]  C Palmer,et al.  Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. J. Watkins,et al.  A figural approach to the role of melodic contour in melody recognition , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  D. Bamber The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph , 1975 .

[18]  A. J. Watkins,et al.  Scale, key, and contour in the discrimination of tuned and mistuned approximations to melody , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Gary E. Wittlich,et al.  The Stratification of Musical Rhythm , 1976 .

[20]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory , 1964 .

[21]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. , 1976, Psychological review.

[22]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part I. Some determinants of expectancies. , 1981 .

[23]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  The function of rule-governed serial contexts in recognition of embedded tones. , 1982 .

[24]  W. Dowling,et al.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  D Deutsch,et al.  The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  M. R. Jones Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  W. Dowling Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. , 1978 .

[28]  S. Handel Listening As Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events , 1989 .

[29]  D. Butler,et al.  Tonal Structure versus Function: Studies of the Recognition of Harmonic Motion , 1984 .

[30]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part II. An expectancy model. , 1982 .

[31]  Edward C. Carterette,et al.  Pitch and Duration as Determinants of Musical Space , 1985 .

[32]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Structural Organization of Events in Time , 1985 .

[33]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Recognizing Melodies: A Dynamic Interpretation , 1987 .

[34]  Irène Deliège Grouping Conditions in Listening to Music: An Approach to Lerdahl & Jackendoff's Grouping Preference Rules , 1987 .

[35]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Dynamic attending and responses to time. , 1989, Psychological review.

[36]  J. Thomassen Melodic accent: Experiments and a tentative model , 1982 .