Are Engineering and Social Justice (In)commensurable? A Theoretical Exploration of Macro-Sociological Frameworks

The degree to which engineering and social justice as fields of practice are (in)commensurable remains an open question. To illuminate important dimensions of that question, we explore intersections between those fields and two macro-sociological frameworks. Those theoretical frameworks—structural functionalism and social conflict—represent contrasting perspectives on how society should be organized. Specifically, we reveal conceptual alignments between structural functionalism and engineering/engineering education and between social conflict and social justice. Those alignments suggest some salient potential catalysts for tensions between engineering and social justice and provide a useful ideological mirror for reflection by all who are committed to the engineering profession and/or to social justice.

[1]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[2]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Grand Challenges for Earth Resources Engineering , 2012 .

[3]  Thomas S. Kuhn,et al.  Theory-change as structure-change: Comments on the sneed formalism , 1976 .

[4]  Mark B. Adams,et al.  The Ghost of the Executed Engineer: Technology and the Fall of the Soviet Union by Loren R. Graham (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[5]  Paul C. Gorski Cognitive Dissonance as a Strategy in Social Justice Teaching. , 2009 .

[6]  Donna Riley,et al.  Engineering and Social Justice , 2008, Engineering and Social Justice.

[7]  M. Tumin,et al.  Some Principles of Stratification: A Critical Analysis , 1953 .

[8]  Wilbert E. Moore,et al.  Some Principles of Stratification , 1945 .

[9]  Caroline A. Baillie,et al.  Engineers within a Local and Global Society , 2006, Engineers within a Local and Global Society.

[10]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[11]  J. Macionis Society the Basics , 1992 .

[12]  D. Milovanović,et al.  Social Justice: Theories, Issues, and Movements , 2007 .

[13]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[14]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  When Students Resist: Ethnography Of A Senior Design Experience , 2002 .

[15]  D. M. Kaplan Readings in the Philosophy of Technology , 2003 .

[16]  William E. Akin,et al.  Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900-1941 , 1977 .

[17]  Karen L. Tonso Student Learning and Gender , 1996 .

[18]  Jeffrey D. Yergler Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th ed. , 2012 .

[19]  Richard H. Kozoll Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice , 2006 .

[20]  J.A. Leydens,et al.  Listening as a Missing Dimension in Engineering Education: Implications for Sustainable Community Development Efforts , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[21]  Caroline A. Baillie,et al.  Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice, Part III: Windows on Society , 2009, Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice, Part III.

[22]  George D. Catalano,et al.  Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice , 2009 .

[23]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[24]  M. Wisnioski Inside “the system”: engineers, scientists, and the boundaries of social protest in the long 1960s , 2003 .

[25]  Caroline A. Baillie,et al.  Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice, Part I: Engineering and Society , 2009, Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice, Part I.

[26]  Edwin T. Layton,et al.  The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession by Edwin T. Layton, Jr (review) , 2023 .

[27]  Amy Sue Bix,et al.  From "Engineeresses" to "Girl Engineers" to "Good Engineers": A History of Women's U.S. Engineering Education , 2004 .

[28]  D. Loye,et al.  The Partnership Way: New Tools for Living and Learning , 1990 .

[29]  Caroline A. Baillie,et al.  Needs and Feasibility: A Guide for Engineers in Community Projects - The Case of Waste for Life , 2010, Needs and Feasibility: A Guide for Engineers in Community Projects.

[30]  Alison Wolf,et al.  Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition , 1986 .

[31]  B. Almgren,et al.  Technology and Society under Lenin and Stalin: Origins of the Soviet Technical Intelligentsia, 1917-1941 , 1980 .

[32]  M. Abrahamson Functional, Conflict and Neofunctional Theories , 2001 .

[33]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[34]  K. Tonso The Impact of Cultural Norms on Women , 1996 .

[35]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  Engineering and Sustainable Community Development , 2010, Engineering and Sustainable Community Development.

[36]  Mary Ann Danowitz,et al.  Enacting Inclusivity Through Engaged Pedagogy: A Higher Education Perspective , 2011 .

[37]  Elizabeth Godfrey,et al.  Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education , 2010 .

[38]  Patricio Silva In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile , 2009 .

[39]  Martin Luther King,et al.  Letter from Birmingham Jail , 1963, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[40]  A. Slaton Ambiguous reform: technical workforce planning and ideologies of class and race in 1960s Chicago , 2010 .

[41]  U. Franklin The real world of technology , 1993 .

[42]  David F. Noble,et al.  America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism by David F. Noble (review) , 1977 .

[43]  B. Newberry Are engineers instrumentalists , 2007 .

[44]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .

[45]  M. Borrego,et al.  Discipline-Based Views of Collaboration in Engineering Education Research Partnerships , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[46]  D. Endres Expanding notions of scientific argument: A case study of the use of scientific argument by American Indians , 2009 .