Effort and Accuracy in Choice

Individuals often use several different strategies such as the expected value rule, conjunctive rule, and elimination-by-aspects, to make decisions. It has been hypothesized that strategy selection is, in part, a function of (1) the ability of a strategy to produce an accurate response and (2) the strategy's demand for mental resources or effort. We examine effort and accuracy and their role in strategy selection. Several strategies that may be used to make choices under risk are simulated using a production system framework. This framework allows the estimation of the effort required to use the strategy in a choice environment, while simultaneously measuring its accuracy relative to a normative model. A series of Monte-Carlo studies varied several aspects of the choice environments, including the complexity of the task and the presence or absence of dominated alternatives. These simulations identify strategies which approximate the accuracy of normative procedures while requiring substantially less effor...

[1]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[3]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[4]  J. Payne,et al.  Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[6]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Evaluation of Partially Described Multiattribute Options , 1978 .

[7]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[8]  N. Klein,et al.  Utility and decision strategies: a second look at the rational decision maker. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[9]  W. Thorngate.  Efficient decision heuristics. , 1980 .

[10]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[11]  Student,et al.  PSYCHOLOGY OF PREFERENCES , 1982, Pediatrics.

[12]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[13]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[14]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[16]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[17]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[18]  B. Brehmer.  In one word: Not from experience. , 1980 .

[19]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[20]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  Muddling through: a response to Yates and Goldstein. , 1983 .

[21]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[22]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  Toward a Procedural Theory of Judgment. , 1982 .

[23]  H A Simon,et al.  The theory of learning by doing. , 1979, Psychological review.

[24]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[25]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[26]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[27]  R. Duda,et al.  Expert Systems Research. , 1983, Science.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[29]  Gary McClelland,et al.  Equal versus Differential Weighting for Multiattribute Decisions: There are No Free Lunches , 1978 .

[30]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[32]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  An information processing model of mental multiplication. , 1969 .

[33]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[34]  E. Thomas,et al.  Notes on effort and achievement-oriented behavior. , 1983, Psychological review.

[35]  Oswald Huber,et al.  The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model , 1980 .

[36]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[38]  Allen Newell,et al.  Harpy, production systems and human cognition , 1978 .

[39]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[40]  Richard W. Olshavsky,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extension , 1979 .

[41]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[42]  Ola Svenson,et al.  On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives , 1976 .

[43]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Decision Making: SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS , 1982 .

[44]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[45]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The Value of Unit Price Information , 1977 .

[46]  P Slovic,et al.  Informing the public about the risks from ionizing radiation. , 1981, Health physics.

[47]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. , 1975 .

[48]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .