Symmetries in Foundation of Quantum Theory and Mathematics

In standard quantum theory, symmetry is defined in the spirit of Klein's Erlangen Program: the background space has a symmetry group, and the basic operators should commute according to the Lie algebra of that group. We argue that the definition should be the opposite: background space has a direct physical meaning only on classical level while on quantum level symmetry should be defined by a Lie algebra of basic operators. Then the fact that de Sitter symmetry is more general than Poincare one can be proved mathematically. The problem of explaining cosmological acceleration is very difficult but, as follows from our results, there exists a scenario that the phenomenon of cosmological acceleration can be explained proceeding from basic principles of quantum theory. The explanation has nothing to do with existence or nonexistence of dark energy and therefore the cosmological constant problem and the dark energy problem do not arise. We consider finite quantum theory (FQT) where states are elements of a space over a finite ring or field with characteristic $p$ and operators of physical quantities act in this space. We prove that, with the same approach to symmetry, FQT and finite mathematics are more general than standard quantum theory and classical mathematics, respectively: the latter theories are special degenerated cases of the former ones in the formal limit $p\to\infty$.

[1]  J. Xia,et al.  Quintom Cosmology: theoretical implications and observations , 2009, 0909.2776.

[2]  F. Lev Modular representations as a possible basis of finite physics , 1989 .

[3]  William G. Lycan,et al.  Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction , 1999 .

[4]  H. Schoutens The Use of Ultraproducts in Commutative Algebra , 2010 .

[5]  Finite Mathematics, Finite Quantum Theory and a Conjecture on the Nature of Time , 2017, Physics of Particles and Nuclei.

[6]  Could only fermions be elementary , 2002, hep-th/0210144.

[7]  Jean-Pierre Serre,et al.  How to use finite fields for problems concerning infinite fields , 2009, 0903.0517.

[8]  Photon position measure , 2010, 1007.0460.

[9]  F. Lev Finite Quantum Theory and Applications to Gravity and Particle Theory , 2011, 1104.4647.

[10]  R. Ellis,et al.  Measurements of $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$ from 42 high redshift supernovae , 1998, astro-ph/9812133.

[11]  Felix M. Lev Why is quantum physics based on complex numbers? , 2006, Finite Fields Their Appl..

[12]  Massless Elementary Particles in a Quantum Theory over a Galois Field , 2002, hep-th/0207192.

[13]  H. Biritz,et al.  On localized states for elementary systems , 1971 .

[14]  F. Lev A new look at the position operator in quantum theory , 2012, Physics of Particles and Nuclei.

[15]  Felix Kaufmann Truth and Logic , 1940 .

[16]  F. Lev Finiteness of physics and its possible consequences , 1993 .

[17]  T. G. Language, Truth and Logic , 1936, Nature.

[18]  P. McGinn Missed opportunities. , 2000, Hospitals & health networks.

[19]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Classical theory of fields , 1952 .

[20]  S. V. Kozyrev,et al.  p-Adic mathematical physics: the first 30 years , 2017, 1705.04758.

[21]  A. Deur An explanation for dark matter and dark energy consistent with the standard model of particle physics and General Relativity , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.

[22]  P. Peebles,et al.  The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy , 2002, astro-ph/0207347.

[23]  F. Lev de Sitter symmetry and quantum theory , 2011, 1110.0240.

[24]  Felix M. Lev,et al.  Positive Cosmological Constant and Quantum Theory , 2010, Symmetry.

[25]  V. Oikonomou,et al.  Unifying inflation with early and late-time dark energy in F(R) gravity , 2019, Physics of the Dark Universe.

[26]  Chen C. Chang,et al.  Model Theory: Third Edition (Dover Books On Mathematics) By C.C. Chang;H. Jerome Keisler;Mathematics , 1966 .

[27]  Evgenii Mikhailovich Lifshitz,et al.  Relativistic quantum theory , 1971 .

[28]  Felix M. Lev,et al.  Introduction to a Quantum Theory over a Galois Field , 2010, Symmetry.

[29]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Why all these prejudices against a constant , 2010, 1002.3966.

[30]  M. Hawton Photon wave mechanics and position eigenvectors , 2007, 0705.3196.

[31]  S. Nojiri,et al.  Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: Unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration , 2003, hep-th/0307288.

[32]  B. Bakker,et al.  On the formulation of two- and three-body relativistic equations employing light-front dynamics , 1979 .

[33]  B. Hikin Axiomatic Affine Unification with Large Gravitational Vector Field Yields Vector-Metric Theory of Gravitation, Electromagnetism and Field Description of Mass-Particles , 2017 .

[34]  E. Saridakis,et al.  Modified cosmology from extended entropy with varying exponent , 2019, The European Physical Journal C.

[35]  M. Khlopov Conspiracy of BSM physics and cosmology. , 2019, 1911.03294.

[36]  S. D. Odintsov,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO MODIFIED GRAVITY AND GRAVITATIONAL ALTERNATIVE FOR DARK ENERGY , 2006, hep-th/0601213.

[37]  Van H. Vu,et al.  Mapping incidences , 2007, J. Lond. Math. Soc..