Forecasting Traditional vs Blended Retirement System for Individual Service Members

Starting January 1, 2018, the Department of Defense new Blended Retirement System (BRS) will go into effect. Military members with less than twelve years of service will have the option to either remain in the current High 3 Retirement System or opt into the BRS. This decision will have a lasting impact on their lives well beyond their military careers. With this in mind, we have developed a Decision Support System that will enable service members to compare the two retirement choices in terms of annual and total lifetime expected value. There were three phases to the development of the decision support tool. First, we identified Simple Exponential Smoothing Method and Artificial Neural Networks as the most accurate forecasting techniques to predict the Thrift Savings Plan Funds’ rate of return. Next, we identified surrogate TSP portfolios based on minimizing downside risk. In the third phase, we identified risk tolerance and the continuation pay multiplier as the key drivers for differentiating between the two systems. Finally, the resulting Decision Support System leverages current time series forecasting techniques, behavioral economic theory, and Bayesian statistics to capture the complexity of this important decision while delivering relevant information to service members in a straightforward manner using an R Studio Shiny Application.

[1]  Vijay S. Bawa,et al.  Abstract: Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mean-Lower Partial Moment Framework , 1977, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[2]  E. Hustead Trends in Retirement Income Plan Administrative Expenses , 1996 .

[3]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Toward the Development of an Equilibrium Capital-Market Model Based on Semivariance , 1974, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[4]  A. Roy SAFETY-FIRST AND HOLDING OF ASSETS , 1952 .

[5]  William B. Riley,et al.  Asset Allocation and Individual Risk Aversion , 1992 .

[6]  Matthew C. Beck Downside Risk Optimization of the Thrift Savings Plan Lifecycle Fund Portfolios , 2012 .

[7]  O. Mitchell,et al.  Lessons for public pensions from Utah's move to pension choice* , 2015, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance.

[8]  W. Sharpe CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[9]  S. Ross The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing , 1976 .

[10]  L. A. Nicholson 401(k) plans , 1995 .

[11]  A. Young Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) , 2011 .

[12]  E. Fama,et al.  The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence , 2003 .

[13]  Federica Teppa,et al.  Choice or no Choice: What Explains the Attractiveness of Default Options , 2008 .

[14]  Jeremy Arkes,et al.  The Dynamic Retention Model for Air Force Officers , 2007 .

[15]  Tien Foo,et al.  Asset Allocation in a Downside Risk Framework , 2000 .

[16]  Feifei Wang,et al.  Decomposing the Age Effect on Risk Tolerance , 2011 .