Analytical closed-form solutions for size-dependent static pull-in behavior in electrostatic micro-actuators via Fredholm integral equation

Abstract In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the first time to obtain static pull-in voltages with fringing field effects in electrostatically actuated cantilever and clamped-clamped micro-beams where the mid-plane stretching and the residual axial load are taken into account for clamped-clamped boundary conditions. The non-classical Euler–Bernoulli beam model containing one material length scale parameter is adopted to effectively capture the size effect. In the solution procedure, the governing fourth-order differential equation of variable coefficients is converted into a Fredholm integral equation. By adopting the first natural mode of the cantilever and clamped-clamped micro-beams as a deflection shape function, the resulting equation is solved for the static pull-in voltages. The accuracy of the present analytical closed-form solution is verified through comparing with the experimentally measured and numerical data conducted in the published works. From the experimental data available in the literature, the value of the material length scale parameter for the (poly)silicon is estimated to be in the order of magnitude of 10 −1  μm. Then, the effect of the material length scale parameter on the pull-in voltages of the cantilever and clamped-clamped micro-beams is investigated. The results indicate that the tensile residual stress can extend the validity range of the classical continuum mechanics to lower beam thicknesses. It is also found that microcantilever beams are more sensitive to the size effect than their corresponding clamped-clamped micro-beams.

[1]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  A microstructure-dependent Timoshenko beam model based on a modified couple stress theory , 2008 .

[2]  Darcy T. Haluzan,et al.  Reducing Pull-In Voltage by Adjusting Gap Shape in Electrostatically Actuated Cantilever and Fixed-Fixed Beams , 2010, Micromachines.

[3]  E. Brusa,et al.  Experimental characterization of electrostatically actuated in-plane bending of microcantilevers , 2008 .

[4]  P. Tong,et al.  Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity , 2002 .

[5]  M. Ahmadi,et al.  Pull-in voltage study of electrostatically actuated fixed-fixed beams using a VLSI on-chip interconnect capacitance model , 2006, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[6]  Chang Liu,et al.  Foundations of MEMS , 2006 .

[7]  D. N. Pawaskar,et al.  Closed-form empirical relations to predict the static pull-in parameters of electrostatically actuated microcantilevers having linear width variation , 2011 .

[8]  Chenzhi Tang Evaluation of length scale effects for micro and nano-sized cantilevered structures , 2010 .

[9]  S. Senturia,et al.  M-TEST: A test chip for MEMS material property measurement using electrostatically actuated test structures , 1997 .

[10]  William D. Nix,et al.  Mechanical properties of thin films , 1989 .

[11]  Patrick J. French,et al.  Characterizing size-dependent effective elastic modulus of silicon nanocantilevers using electrostatic pull-in instability , 2009 .

[12]  Shiuh-Jer Huang,et al.  Some design considerations on the electrostatically actuated microstructures , 2004 .

[13]  Mohammad Taghi Ahmadian,et al.  Static pull-in analysis of microcantilevers based on the modified couple stress theory , 2011 .

[14]  Mostafa Baghani,et al.  Analytical study on size-dependent static pull-in voltage of microcantilevers using the modified couple stress theory , 2012 .

[15]  G. Rezazadeh,et al.  Application of the Generalized Differential Quadrature Method to the Study of Pull-In Phenomena of MEMS Switches , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[16]  Fan Yang,et al.  Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity , 2003 .

[17]  G. Rezazadeh,et al.  Comparison of generalized differential quadrature and Galerkin methods for the analysis of micro-electro-mechanical coupled systems , 2009 .

[18]  J. Kuang,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of shaped micro-actuators solved using the differential quadrature method , 2004 .

[19]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Mechanical characterization of micro/nanoscale structures for MEMS/NEMS applications using nanoindentation techniques. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[20]  S. Chaterjee,et al.  A large deflection model for the pull-in analysis of electrostatically actuated microcantilever beams , 2009 .

[21]  M. Ashby,et al.  Micro-hardness of annealed and work-hardened copper polycrystals , 1996 .

[22]  Lin Yuanhui,et al.  フォトレジスト上のパリレンC(POP):ポリマー/金属ナノワイヤ製造のための低温スペーサ技術 , 2011 .

[23]  H. Tilmans,et al.  Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators part II. theory and performance , 1994 .

[24]  Kieran Delaney,et al.  Generalized closed-form models for pull-in analysis of micro cantilever beams subjected to partial electrostatic load , 2012 .

[25]  S. K. Park,et al.  Bernoulli–Euler beam model based on a modified couple stress theory , 2006 .

[26]  Yong Huang,et al.  A new approach for free vibration of axially functionally graded beams with non-uniform cross-section , 2010 .

[27]  H. Nathanson,et al.  The resonant gate transistor , 1967 .

[28]  Andrew W. Mcfarland,et al.  Role of material microstructure in plate stiffness with relevance to microcantilever sensors , 2005 .

[29]  Singiresu S. Rao Vibration of Continuous Systems , 2019 .

[30]  G. Rezazadeh,et al.  Application of piezoelectric layers in electrostatic MEM actuators: controlling of pull-in voltage , 2006 .

[31]  Elias C. Aifantis,et al.  Exploring the applicability of gradient elasticity to certain micro/nano reliability problems , 2008 .

[32]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The coalescence of closely spaced drops when they are at different electric potentials , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[33]  H. Tilmans,et al.  Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators Part I. Design and fabrication , 1994 .

[34]  Steven W. Shaw,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering the Nonlinear Response of Resonant Microbeam Systems with Purely-parametric Electrostatic Actuation , 2022 .

[35]  Alan Mathewson,et al.  Analysis of electromechanical boundary effects on the pull-in of micromachined fixed–fixed beams , 2003 .

[36]  Robert Puers,et al.  Pull-in voltage analysis of electrostatically actuated beam structures with fixed–fixed and fixed–free end conditions , 2002 .

[37]  W. Miller,et al.  A closed-form model for the pull-in voltage of electrostatically actuated cantilever beams , 2005 .

[38]  Shenjie Zhou,et al.  Size-dependent pull-in instability of electrostatically actuated microbeam-based MEMS , 2011 .

[39]  Ioannis Chasiotis,et al.  The mechanical strength of polysilicon films: Part 2. Size effects associated with elliptical and circular perforations , 2003 .

[40]  Lin Wang,et al.  Size effect on the static behavior of electrostatically actuated microbeams , 2011 .

[41]  J. Pelesko,et al.  Modeling MEMS and NEMS , 2002 .

[42]  M. Esashi,et al.  Ultrathin single-crystalline-silicon cantilever resonators: Fabrication technology and significant specimen size effect on Young’s modulus , 2003 .

[43]  E. S. Hung,et al.  Extending the travel range of analog-tuned electrostatic actuators , 1999 .

[44]  O. Bochobza-Degani,et al.  Modeling the Pull-In Parameters of Electrostatic Actuators with a Novel Lumped Two Degrees of Freedom Pull in Model , 2002 .

[45]  Shenjie Zhou,et al.  The size-dependent natural frequency of Bernoulli–Euler micro-beams , 2008 .

[46]  M. Porfiri,et al.  Electromechanical Model of Electrically Actuated Narrow Microbeams , 2006, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[47]  Gabriel M. Rebeiz,et al.  Micromachined devices for wireless communications , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[48]  A. Chong,et al.  Indentation model and strain gradient plasticity law for glassy polymers , 1999 .