Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes.

Recent hypotheses argue that phylogenetic relatedness should predict both the niche differences that stabilise coexistence and the average fitness differences that drive competitive dominance. These still largely untested predictions complicate Darwin's hypothesis that more closely related species less easily coexist, and challenge the use of community phylogenetic patterns to infer competition. We field parameterised models of competitor dynamics with pairs of 18 California annual plant species, and then related species' niche and fitness differences to their phylogenetic distance. Stabilising niche differences were unrelated to phylogenetic distance, while species' average fitness showed phylogenetic structure. This meant that more distant relatives had greater competitive asymmetry, which should favour the coexistence of close relatives. Nonetheless, coexistence proved unrelated to phylogeny, due in part to increasing variance in fitness differences with phylogenetic distance, a previously overlooked property of such relationships. Together, these findings question the expectation that distant relatives should more readily coexist.

[1]  Daniel S. Park,et al.  A test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Stephen P Hubbell,et al.  The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. , 2006, Ecology.

[3]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[4]  Frédéric Médail,et al.  Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands , 2005 .

[5]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  J. H. Burns,et al.  More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[8]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[9]  J. Pausas,et al.  Soil shapes community structure through fire , 2010, Oecologia.

[10]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[11]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[12]  C. Elton.  Competition and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1946 .

[13]  Shixiao Yu,et al.  Experimental evidence for a phylogenetic Janzen-Connell effect in a subtropical forest. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[14]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[15]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[16]  P. Keddy,et al.  Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants , 2008 .

[17]  A. Vidu,et al.  The Struggle , 2013 .

[18]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Evolutionary history and the strength of species interactions: testing the phylogenetic limiting similarity hypothesis. , 2014, Ecology.

[19]  David Tilman,et al.  Secondary Succession and the Pattern of Plant Dominance Along Experimental Nitrogen Gradients , 1987 .

[20]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[21]  Richard P Duncan,et al.  Darwin's naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[22]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Species Competition and Predation , 2013 .

[23]  M. Suchard,et al.  Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7 , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[25]  J. Grinnell.  The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[26]  Barbara R. Holland,et al.  Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R , 2007 .

[27]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  G. Gauze.  The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .

[29]  I. Amit,et al.  A niche , 2004 .

[30]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence , 2010 .

[31]  Lin Jiang,et al.  An Experimental Test of Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[32]  G. F. Gause.  The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[33]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[34]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[35]  Bernhard Schmid,et al.  Experimental plant communities develop phylogenetically overdispersed abundance distributions during assembly. , 2013, Ecology.

[36]  Katherine E. Mills,et al.  MAINTENANCE OF DIVERSITY WITHIN PLANT COMMUNITIES: SOIL PATHOGENS AS AGENTS OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK , 1998 .

[37]  J. A. Bennett,et al.  Increased competition does not lead to increased phylogenetic overdispersion in a native grassland. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[38]  L. L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography. , 1959 .

[39]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[40]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[41]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[42]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Geometry, heterogeneity and competition in variable environments , 1990 .

[43]  J. Losos.  Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[44]  J. Stachowicz,et al.  Trait vs. phylogenetic diversity as predictors of competition and community composition in herbivorous marine amphipods. , 2013, Ecology letters.