Paleomagnetic reconstruction of the global geomagnetic field evolution during the Matuyama/Brunhes transition: Iterative Bayesian inversion and independent verification

Abstract The Earth's magnetic field changed its polarity from the last reversed into today's normal state approximately 780 000 years ago. While before and after this so called Matuyama/Brunhes reversal, the Earth magnetic field was essentially an axial dipole, the details of its transitional structure are still largely unknown. Here, a Bayesian inversion method is developed to reconstruct the spherical harmonic expansion of this transitional field from paleomagnetic data. This is achieved by minimizing the total variational power at the core–mantle boundary during the transition under paleomagnetic constraints. The validity of the inversion technique is proved in two ways. First by inverting synthetic data sets from a modeled reversal. Here it is possible to reliably reconstruct the Gauss coefficients even from noisy records. Second by iteratively combining four geographically distributed high quality paleomagnetic records of the Matuyama/Brunhes reversal into a single geometric reversal scenario without assuming an a priori common age model. The obtained spatio-temporal reversal scenario successfully predicts most independent Matuyama/Brunhes transitional records. Therefore, the obtained global reconstruction based on paleomagnetic data invites to compare the inferred transitional field structure with results from numerical geodynamo models regarding the morphology of the transitional field. It is found that radial magnetic flux patches form at the equator and move polewards during the transition. Our model indicates an increase of non-dipolar energy prior to the last reversal and a non-dipolar dominance during the transition. Thus, the character and information of surface geomagnetic field records is strongly site dependent. The reconstruction also offers new answers to the question of existence of preferred longitudinal bands during the transition and to the problem of reversal duration. Different types of directional variations of the surface geomagnetic field, continuous or abrupt, are found during the transition. Two preferred longitudinal bands along the Americas and East Asia are not predicted for uniformly distributed sampling locations on the globe. Similar to geodynamo models with CMB heatflux derived from present day lower mantle heterogeneities, a preference of transitional VGPs for the Pacific hemisphere is found. The paleomagnetic duration of reversals shows not only a latitudinal, but also a longitudinal variation. Even the paleomagnetically determined age of the reversal varies significantly between different sites on the globe. The described Bayesian inversion technique can easily be applied to other high quality full vector reversal records. Also its extension to inversion of secular variation and excursion data is straightforward.

[1]  B. Clement Dependence of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude , 2004, Nature.

[2]  K. Hoffman Dipolar reversal states of the geomagnetic field and core–mantle dynamics , 1992, Nature.

[3]  Longitudinal confinement of geomagnetic reversal paths as a possible sedimentary artefact , 1992, Nature.

[4]  V. Hsu,et al.  The zonal harmonic model of polarity transitions: A test using successive reversals , 1985 .

[5]  Xixi Zhao,et al.  Matuyama-Brunhes reversal and Kamikatsura event on Maui: paleomagnetic directions, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages and implications , 2004 .

[6]  P. Gillot,et al.  Paleointensity variations across the last geomagnetic reversal at La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain , 1999 .

[7]  F. Heller,et al.  The Matuyama/Brunhes geomagnetic polarity transition at Lingtai and Baoji, Chinese Loess Plateau , 2001 .

[8]  A. Mazaud ‘Sawtooth’ variation in magnetic intensity profiles and delayed acquisition of magnetization in deep sea cores , 1996 .

[9]  M. Fuller,et al.  Zonal harmonic models of reversal transition fields , 1981 .

[10]  T. Dobeneck,et al.  Geomagnetic Events and Relative Paleointensity Records - Clues to High-Resolution Paleomagnetic Chronostratigraphies of Late Quaternary Marine Sediments? , 1999 .

[11]  D. Kent,et al.  Geomagnetic Polarity Transition Records from Five Hydraulic Piston Core Sites in the North Atlantic , 1987 .

[12]  M. Raymo,et al.  A Pliocene‐Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records , 2005 .

[13]  K. Hoffman Palaeomagnetic excursions, aborted reversals and transitional fields , 1981, Nature.

[14]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[15]  Jo Lock,et al.  Iaga Paleomagnetic Databases with access , 1996 .

[16]  C. Laj,et al.  Geomagnetic reversal paths , 1991, Nature.

[17]  G. D. Mead,et al.  Some new methods in geomagnetic field modeling applied to the 1960-1980 epoch. , 1982 .

[18]  M. Raymo,et al.  The Mid‐Pleistocene climate transition: A deep sea carbon isotopic perspective , 1997 .

[19]  S. Malin,et al.  Geomagnetic temporal change: 1903-1982 - A spline representation , 1986 .

[20]  M. Fuller,et al.  Influence of drilling on two records of the matuyama/brunhes polarity transition in marine sediment cores near Gran Canaria , 1998 .

[21]  T. Herbert,et al.  Astronomical calibration of the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary: Consequences for magnetic remanence acquisition in marine carbonates and the Asian loess sequences , 1996 .

[22]  Gerold Wefer,et al.  Use of proxies in paleoceanography : examples from the South Atlantic , 1999 .

[23]  L. Tauxe,et al.  The Matuyama-Brunhes transition recorded from Lake Tecopa sediments (California) , 1988 .

[24]  Zhizhong Zhao,et al.  Remagnetization of Quaternary eolian deposits: A case study from SE Chinese Loess Plateau , 2005 .

[25]  Ronald T. Merrill,et al.  Geomagnetic polarity transitions , 1999 .

[26]  A. Mazaud An attempt at reconstructing the geomagnetic field at the core-mantle boundary during the Upper Olduvai polarity transition (1.66 Myear) , 1995 .

[27]  Catherine Constable,et al.  Gaussian statistics for palaeomagnetic vectors , 2003 .

[28]  B. Jicha,et al.  Paleomagnetic directions and 40Ar/39Ar ages from the Tatara‐San Pedro volcanic complex, Chilean Andes: Lava record of a Matuyama‐Brunhes precursor? , 2004 .

[29]  A. Cox,et al.  Brunhes-Matuyama polarity transition , 1976 .

[30]  R. Duncan,et al.  Records of geomagnetic reversals from volcanic islands of French Polynesia : 2. Paleomagnetic study of a flow sequence (1.2-0.6 Ma) from the island of Tahiti and discussion of reversal models , 1990 .

[31]  H. Shibuya,et al.  Palaeomagnetic records of the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity transition from ODP Leg 124 (Celebes and Sulu seas) , 2000 .

[32]  J. Love,et al.  A database for the Matuyama-Brunhes magnetic reversal , 1997 .

[33]  B. Jicha,et al.  Structural and temporal requirements for geomagnetic field reversal deduced from lava flows , 2005, Nature.

[34]  S. Runcorn Polar path in geomagnetic reversals , 1992, Nature.

[35]  L. Meynadier,et al.  Palaeomagnetic constraints on the geometry of the geomagnetic field during reversals , 1992, Nature.

[36]  Pierre Camps,et al.  Absence of preferred longitude sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals , 1993, Nature.

[37]  Michael W. McElhinny,et al.  The Magnetic Field of the Earth: Paleomagnetism, the Core, and the Deep Mantle , 1997 .

[38]  M. Hyodo Possibility of Reconstruction of the Past Geomagnetic Field from Homogeneous Sediments , 1984 .

[39]  S. Vriend,et al.  Fuzzy c-means cluster analysis of early diagenetic effects on natural remanent magnetisation acquisition in a 1.1 Myr piston core from the Central Mediterranean , 1994 .

[40]  M. Okada,et al.  Detailed paleomagnetic records during the Brunhes-Matuyama geomagnetic reversal, and a direct determination of depth lag for magnetization in marine sediments , 1989 .

[41]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary , 1992 .

[42]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  An examination of simulated geomagnetic reversals from a palaeomagnetic perspective , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[43]  K. Hoffman Transitional paleomagnetic field behavior: Preferred paths or patches? , 1996 .

[44]  K. Hoffman Temporal aspects of the last reversal of Earth's magnetic field , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals , 1999, Nature.

[46]  J. Tarduno,et al.  Non-steady state magnetic mineral reduction, chemical lock-in, and delayed remanence acquisition in pelagic sediments , 1996 .

[47]  D. Kent,et al.  A Southern Hemisphere record of the Matuyama‐Brunhes polarity reversal , 1991 .

[48]  Latitudinal dependency of geomagnetic polarity transition durations , 1984, Nature.

[49]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Equatorial and mid-latitude records of the last geomagnetic reversal from the Atlantic Ocean , 1989 .

[50]  X. Quidelleur,et al.  Geomagnetic changes across the last reversal recorded in lava flows from La Palma, Canary Islands , 1996 .

[51]  Bradford M. Clement,et al.  Geographical distribution of transitional VGPs: Evidence for non-zonal equatorial symmetry during the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal , 1991 .

[52]  C. Laj,et al.  The Matuyama-Brunhes and Upper Jaramillo transitions recorded in a loess section at Weinan, north-central China , 1994 .

[53]  P. Gillot,et al.  The age and duration of the Matuyama–Brunhes transition from new K–Ar data from La Palma (Canary Islands) and revisited 40Ar/39Ar ages , 2003 .

[54]  T. Tanimoto,et al.  Spherical harmonic analyses of paleomagnetic data: The time‐averaged geomagnetic field for the past 5 Myr and the Brunhes‐Matuyama reversal , 1999 .

[55]  E. Herrero-Bervera,et al.  Some characteristics of geomagnetic reversals inferred from detailed volcanic records , 2003 .

[56]  N. Shackleton,et al.  Misleading positions of geomagnetic reversal boundaries in Eurasian loess and implications for correlation between continental and marine sedimentary sequences , 1999 .