A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Marelli,et al. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. , 2015, Psychological review.
[2] Amac Herdagdelen,et al. Twitter n-gram corpus with demographic metadata , 2013, Language Resources and Evaluation.
[3] Marco Marelli,et al. Social Media and Language Processing: How Facebook and Twitter Provide the Best Frequency Estimates for Studying Word Recognition , 2016, Cogn. Sci..
[4] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[5] Yasushi Hino,et al. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[6] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Why Form-Meaning Mappings Are Not Entirely Arbitrary in Language , 2006 .
[7] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] M. Brysbaert,et al. Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[9] Cristina Burani,et al. Word reading and picture naming in Italian , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[10] Dušica Filipović Đurđević,et al. An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. , 2011, Psychological review.
[11] J. Grainger. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .
[12] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[13] Dagmar Divjak,et al. A Learning Perspective on Individual Differences in Skilled Reading: Exploring and Exploiting Orthographic and Semantic Discrimination Cues , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[15] Petar Milin,et al. Discrimination in lexical decision , 2017, PloS one.
[16] M. Marelli,et al. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[17] Angeliki Lazaridou,et al. Multimodal Word Meaning Induction From Minimal Exposure to Natural Text. , 2017, Cognitive science.
[18] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[19] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] D. Samson,et al. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task , 2004, Brain and Language.
[21] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[22] M. Brysbaert,et al. Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting : A review and empirical validation , 2017 .
[23] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[24] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[25] J. Bowers,et al. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .
[26] R. H. Baayen,et al. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .
[27] Chris Westbury,et al. Performance impact of stop lists and morphological decomposition on word–word corpus-based semantic space models , 2015, Behavior research methods.
[28] Jennifer M. Rodd,et al. When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[29] Sanjeev Arora,et al. Learning Topic Models -- Going beyond SVD , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.
[30] Marco Marelli,et al. Compositional-ly Derived Representations of Morphologically Complex Words in Distributional Semantics , 2013, ACL.
[31] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.
[32] Curt Burgess,et al. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .
[33] D. Balota,et al. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[34] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[35] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.
[37] Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .
[38] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.
[39] Georgiana Dinu,et al. Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors , 2014, ACL.
[40] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[41] S. Lupker,et al. The nature of orthographic–phonological and orthographic–semantic relationships for Japanese kana and kanji words , 2011, Behavior research methods.
[42] Kenneth Ward Church,et al. Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.
[43] Dennis Norris,et al. The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.
[44] Marco Baroni,et al. Frege in Space: A Program of Compositional Distributional Semantics , 2014 .
[45] Marco Marelli,et al. A relatedness benchmark to test the role of determiners in compositional distributional semantics , 2013, ACL.
[46] Patrick Pantel,et al. From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[47] Marco Marelli,et al. Semantic Transparency in Free Stems: The Effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on Word Recognition , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[48] S. Andrews. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .
[49] Geoff Hollis,et al. The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[50] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Word Representations: A Simple and General Method for Semi-Supervised Learning , 2010, ACL.
[51] Mark J. Huff,et al. An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[52] Helmut Schmid,et al. Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German , 1999 .
[53] D. Jared,et al. The Effect of Semantic Transparency on the Processing of Morphologically Derived Words: Evidence From Decision Latencies and Event-Related Potentials , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[54] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.
[55] Curt Burgess,et al. Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] Tomas Mikolov,et al. Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information , 2016, TACL.
[57] D. Pecher,et al. Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.