A New Technique to Increase Reliability in Measuring the Axis of Bone.

Measuring bone angles is an important method for diagnosing disease and predicting the prognosis in orthopedics. Traditionally, the angle is measured using lines drawn manually and adjusted by the naked eye. The purpose of the present study was to propose new methods to measure the bone angles formed by the axes of the calcaneus with good reliability and low operational error. The 2 new methods used linear regression analysis of the points inside and on the "envelope" line. The traditional method used the vector of the lines drawn for calculation. Digital radiographs of the lateral view of the feet from 51 patients were collected, and the angles were measured using these 3 methods. Next, we analyzed the reliability, differences, and correlations of these 3 methods. The intra- and interobserver comparisons revealed significant differences between the results of the 2 new methods and those of the traditional method. In addition, the new methods had greater reliability and better intra- and interobserver correlations than did the traditional method. We suggest that these 2 new methods to measure bone axis should be added to the Picture Archiving and Communication System to obtain more reliable and standardized data in clinical practice and for future research purposes.

[1]  O. Kose,et al.  Re: Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles [Foot Ankle Surg. 19 (1) (2013) 18-21]. , 2013, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[2]  Young-Jin Jung,et al.  How Reliable Are Standard Radiographic Measures of the Foot and Ankle in Children With Achondroplasia? , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Richard Walter,et al.  Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles. , 2013, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[4]  K. Lee,et al.  Reliability of Lower-limb Alignment Measurements in Patients With Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  K. Lee,et al.  Reliability and Relationship of Radiographic Measurements in Hallux Valgus , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  F. Impellizzeri,et al.  Reliability and Agreement of Measures Used in Radiographic Evaluation of the Adult Hip , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  N. Chockalingam,et al.  Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. , 2010, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[8]  K. Lee,et al.  Reliability and validity of radiographic measurements in hindfoot varus and valgus. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  N Chockalingam,et al.  Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: a review of current techniques. , 2010, Foot.

[10]  R. Laughlin,et al.  Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in the Radiographic Evaluation of Adult Flatfoot Deformity , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  T. Yasuda,et al.  Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  The anatomy of cavus foot deformity. , 2008, Foot and ankle clinics.

[13]  Carlos Piqué-Vidal,et al.  Radiographic Angles in Hallux Valgus: Differences Between Measurements Made Manually and With a Computerized Program , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[14]  A. Bryant,et al.  Radiographic investigation of angular and linear measurements including first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and rearfoot to forefoot axis angle. , 2005, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[15]  Daniel C. Farber,et al.  Goniometric Versus Computerized Angle Measurement in Assessing Hallux Valgus , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[16]  S. Trevino,et al.  Comparison between Manual and Computer-Assisted Measurements of Hallux Valgus Parameters , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[17]  J. Pruijs,et al.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis , 1994, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  R. Schwend,et al.  Cavus Foot Deformity in Children , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[19]  K. Knahr,et al.  Reproducibility of the Radiographic Metatarsophalangeal Angle in Hallux Surgery , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  K. Knahr,et al.  Intra- and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery: improvement and validation of a method. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Intra- and Inter-observer Reliability of the Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle in Adult Hallux Valgus , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[22]  M. Coughlin,et al.  The Reliability of Angular Measurements in Hallux Valgus Deformities , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  M A Schork,et al.  Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  J. Birch,et al.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  W. Cole,et al.  Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of the child's hip. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  M. Jahss Evaluation of the cavus foot for orthopedic treatment. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.