Volunteered Geographic Information in Natural Hazard Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Approaches with a Focus on Preparedness and Mitigation

With the rise of new technologies, citizens can contribute to scientific research via Web 2.0 applications for collecting and distributing geospatial data. Integrating local knowledge, personal experience and up-to-date geoinformation indicates a promising approach for the theoretical framework and the methods of natural hazard analysis. Our systematic literature review aims at identifying current research and directions for future research in terms of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) within natural hazard analysis. Focusing on both the preparedness and mitigation phase results in eleven articles from two literature databases. A qualitative analysis for in-depth information extraction reveals auspicious approaches regarding community engagement and data fusion, but also important research gaps. Mainly based in Europe and North America, the analysed studies deal primarily with floods and forest fires, applying geodata collected by trained citizens who are improving their knowledge and making their own interpretations. Yet, there is still a lack of common scientific terms and concepts. Future research can use these findings for the adaptation of scientific models of natural hazard analysis in order to enable the fusion of data from technical sensors and VGI. The development of such general methods shall contribute to establishing the user integration into various contexts, such as natural hazard analysis.

[1]  Kuniyoshi Takeuchi,et al.  Extreme natural hazards, disaster risks and societal implications , 2014 .

[2]  Dirk Heinrichs,et al.  SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND FLOOD RISKS: THE CASE OF SANTIAGO DE CHILE , 2010 .

[3]  Frank O. Ostermann,et al.  Digital Earth from vision to practice: making sense of citizen-generated content , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[4]  M. Haklay.  Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation , 2013 .

[5]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information , 2012 .

[6]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[7]  James McPhee,et al.  The influence of urban expansion on the flood hazard in Santiago de Chile , 2009, 2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.

[8]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  M. Pelling,et al.  Determinants of risk: Exposure and vulnerability , 2012 .

[10]  Stefan Poslad,et al.  Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Intelligently Sharing Large-Volumes of Real-Time Sensor Data During Natural Disasters , 2013, Data Sci. J..

[11]  Pascal Neis,et al.  The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007-2011 , 2011, Future Internet.

[12]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Claire Allen,et al.  A resource for those preparing for and responding to natural disasters, humanitarian crises, and major healthcare emergencies , 2014, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[15]  G. Antes,et al.  Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[16]  Kate Burningham,et al.  'It'll never happen to me': understanding public awareness of local flood risk. , 2008, Disasters.

[17]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr , 2013 .

[18]  Hans Gebhardt,et al.  Hazards: Naturgefahren und Naturrisiken , 2016 .

[19]  Carol Ann Amaratunga,et al.  Building community disaster resilience through a virtual community of practice (VCOP) , 2014 .

[20]  Sophia B. Liu,et al.  Crisis Crowdsourcing Framework: Designing Strategic Configurations of Crowdsourcing for the Emergency Management Domain , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Emily Schnebele,et al.  Improving remote sensing flood assessment using volunteered geographical data , 2013 .

[22]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[23]  Pascal Neis,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[24]  B. Wisner,et al.  At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters , 1996 .

[25]  Roberto Rudari,et al.  A hydrological analysis of the 4 November 2011 event in Genoa , 2012 .

[26]  Wesley W. Chu,et al.  Data mining and knowledge discovery for big data : methodologies, challenge and opportunities , 2014 .

[27]  Juma Hemed Lungo,et al.  Citizen sensors or extreme publics? Transparency and accountability interventions on the mobile geoweb , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[28]  T. Cova.  GIS in emergency management , 2005 .

[29]  Thomas Glade,et al.  Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen , 2008 .

[30]  RamKumar Narayanan,et al.  A novel approach to urban flood monitoring using computer vision , 2014, Fifth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT).

[31]  D. Cole,et al.  A systematic review of the application and utility of geographical information systems for exploring disease-disease relationships in paediatric global health research: the case of anaemia and malaria , 2013, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[32]  N. Coops,et al.  An Exploratory Assessment of a Smartphone Application for Public Participation in Forest Fuels Measurement in the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2013 .

[33]  Martha C. Monroe,et al.  Social science to improve fuels management: a synthesis of research relevant to communicating with homeowners about fuels management , 2006 .

[34]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  N. Coops,et al.  Assessing the quality of forest fuel loading data collected using public participation methods and smartphones , 2014 .

[36]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index , 2009 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Social Media in Disaster Relief , 2014 .

[38]  J Brian Houston,et al.  Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. , 2015, Disasters.

[39]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition , 2007 .

[40]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[41]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Drought and food security - Improving decision-support via new technologies and innovative collaboration , 2015 .

[42]  Yang Hong,et al.  A cloud-based global flood disaster community cyber-infrastructure: Development and demonstration , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Bernhard Mittermaier,et al.  Web of Science / Web of Knowledge : A unified information solution for a research institution , 2007 .

[44]  Michael Vetter,et al.  GIS-Based Roughness Derivation for Flood Simulations: A Comparison of Orthophotos, LiDAR and Crowdsourced Geodata , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Clara B. Aranda-Jan,et al.  Geographic information analysis and web-based geoportals to explore malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of approaches , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[46]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  The use of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) and Crowdsourcing in Disaster Management: a Systematic Literature Review , 2013, AMCIS.

[47]  M. Goodchild.  Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[48]  M. Haklay.  How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[49]  Stéphane Roche,et al.  GeoWeb and crisis management: issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information , 2011, GeoJournal.

[50]  K. Crawford,et al.  The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disasters , 2015 .

[51]  Reinhard Mechler,et al.  Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability the missing link? , 2015, Climatic Change.

[52]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Updating digital elevation models via change detection and fusion of human and remote sensor data in urban environments , 2015, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[53]  Jamal Jokar Arsanjani,et al.  Understanding the potential relationship between the socio-economic variables and contributions to OpenStreetMap , 2015, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[54]  F. Ostermann,et al.  Automated geographic context analysis for volunteered information , 2013 .

[55]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? , 2015 .

[56]  Sven Schade,et al.  Digital Earth's Nervous System for crisis events: real-time Sensor Web Enablement of Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[57]  W. Botzen,et al.  Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management , 2015 .