Prison telemedicine and telehealth utilization in the United States: state and federal perceptions of benefits and barriers.

Although national justice and technology associations have endorsed the utilization of telemedicine and telehealth, little is known about the current utilization of this technology across our nation's correctional facilities. Several voluntary registries and state Web sites exist, but only limited information on telemedicine utilization may be gleaned from these. The purpose of the present study was to fill this void by reporting the utilization patterns in telemedicine programs in state and federal correctional facilities throughout the United States. Using telephone-administered interviews, data were collected from all 50 states. Respondents were asked about utilization, benefits, and barriers to the use of technology in healthcare in state and federal correctional facilities. Slightly over half of state correctional institutions and 39% of federal institutions are using some sort of telehealth or telemedicine applications. The most common benefits cited were improved security, personnel safety, costs savings, and access to specialists. The most common barriers cited were costs of technology, resistance from medical personnel, lack of staff technical expertise, and difficulties coordinating services.

[1]  Julie Evans,et al.  ``Is There Anything Else You Would Like to Tell Us'' – Methodological Issues in the Use of Free-Text Comments from Postal Surveys , 2004 .

[2]  P. Diamond,et al.  The Prevalence of Mental Illness in Prison , 2001, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[3]  B. Stamm Bridging the rural-urban divide with telehealth and telemedicine. , 2003 .

[4]  Thomas J. Fagan,et al.  Individuals with serious mental illnesses in prison: Rural perspectives and issues. , 2003 .

[5]  R. Hodge,et al.  Introducing telemedicine technology to rural physicians and settings. , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  M. Mccue,et al.  Financial analysis of telecardiology used in a correctional setting. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  T. Mccain,et al.  Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in a prison environment , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  M. Kienzle,et al.  Telemedicine to Iowa's correctional facilities: initial clinical experience and assessment of program costs. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  Peter L. Nacci,et al.  Telemedicine Can Reduce Correctional Health Care Costs : An Evaluation of a Prison Telemedicine Network Executive Summary , 1999 .

[10]  Philip R. Magaletta,et al.  Advancing psychology services through telehealth in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. , 1998 .

[11]  B O Brunicardi Financial analysis of savings from telemedicine in Ohio's prison system. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  Financial analysis of telemedicine in a prison system. , 1997, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  J E Hastings Telemedicine today. , 1997, Hawaii medical journal.

[14]  T. Mccain,et al.  An Ohio telemedicine system for prison inmates: a case report. , 1996, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  E. Martin MEDICAL CARE IN PRISONS , 1985, The Lancet.