Talking to the Academy

Hedging refers to linguistic strategies that qualify categorical commitment to express possibility rather than certainty. In scientific writing, hedging is central to effective argument: Hedging is a rhetorical means of gaining reader acceptance of claims, allowing writers to convey their attitude to the truth of their statements and to anticipate possible objections. Because hedges allow writers to express claims with precision, caution, and modesty, they are a significant resource for academics. However, little is known about the way hedging is typically expressed in particular domains or the particular functions it serves in different genres. This article identifies the major forms, functions, and distribution of hedges in a corpus of 26 molecular biology research articles and describes the importance of hedging in this genre.

[1]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[2]  L. Zadeh.  A Fuzzy-Set-Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Hedges , 1972 .

[3]  George Lakoff,et al.  Hedges: A Study In Meaning Criteria And The Logic Of Fuzzy Concepts , 1973 .

[4]  R. Quirk.  A Grammar of contemporary English , 1974 .

[5]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[6]  Michael R. Perkins,et al.  Modal Expressions in English , 1983 .

[7]  Diana E. Adams Smith,et al.  Medical Discourse: Aspects of Author's Comment. , 1984 .

[8]  John Ziman.  An Introduction To Science Studies , 1984 .

[9]  J. Holmes.  MODIFYING ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE , 1984 .

[10]  W. J. V. Kopple,et al.  Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse , 1985, College Composition & Communication.

[11]  E. Hanania,et al.  Verb form and rhetorical function in science writing: A study of MS theses in biology, chemistry, and physics , 1985 .

[12]  Greg Myers,et al.  Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology Articles , 1985 .

[13]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[14]  Mava Jo Powell.  Purposive vagueness: an evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressions , 1985 .

[15]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  ‘A Matter of Prolonged Field Work‘: Notes Towards a Modal Grammar of English1 , 1986 .

[16]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[17]  Graeme Kennedy,et al.  Expressing Temporal Frequency in Academic English , 1987 .

[18]  J. Coates.  EPISTEMIC MODALITY AND SPOKEN DISCOURSE , 1987 .

[19]  Betty Lou Dubois,et al.  “Something on the order of around forty to forty-four”: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks , 1987, Language in Society.

[20]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[21]  Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday's Functional Grammar , 1988 .

[22]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks , 1988 .

[23]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[24]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[25]  Avon Crismore,et al.  Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse , 1990 .

[26]  R. Quirk,et al.  A Student's Grammar of the English Language , 1990 .

[27]  H. Longino.  Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[28]  Agnes Weiyun He.  Exploring modality in institutional interactions: Cases from academic counselling encounters , 1993 .

[29]  Avon Crismore,et al.  Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing , 1993 .

[30]  Dorothea K. Thompson.  Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science , 1993 .

[31]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .

[32]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks , 1994 .