Investigating network architectures for body sensor networks

The choice of network architecture for body sensor networks is an important one because it significantly affects overall system design and performance. Current approaches use propagation models or specific medium access control protocols to study architectural choices. The issue with the first approach is that the models do not capture the effects of interference and fading. Further, the question of architecture can be raised without imposing a specific MAC protocol. In this paper, we first evaluate the star and multihop network topologies against design goals, such as power and delay efficiency. We then design experiments to investigate the behavior of electromagnetic propagation at 2.4 GHz through and around the human body. Along the way, we develop a novel visualization tool to aid in summarizing information across all pairs of nodes, thus providing a way to discern patterns in large data sets visually. Our results suggest that while a star architecture with nodes operating at low power levels might suffice in a cluttered indoor environment, nodes in an outdoor setting will have to operate at higher power levels or change to a multihop architecture to support acceptable packet delivery ratios. Through simple analysis, the potential increase in packet delivery ratio by switching to a multihop architecture is evaluated.

[1]  N. Kuster,et al.  Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300 MHz , 1992 .

[2]  J. Stankovic,et al.  An Advanced Wireless Sensor Network for Health Monitoring , 2022 .

[3]  Hari Balakrishnan Opportunities and Challenges in High-Rate Wireless Sensor Networking , 2004, LCN.

[4]  R. Pethig,et al.  Dielectric properties of body tissues. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[5]  G. Vermeeren,et al.  Path loss model for wireless narrowband communication above flat phantom , 2006 .

[6]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  The Wireless Autonomous Spanning tree Protocol for Multihop Wireless Body Area Networks , 2006, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services.

[7]  Piet Demeester,et al.  Networking and propagation issues in body area networks , 2004 .

[8]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  HealthGear: a real-time wearable system for monitoring and analyzing physiological signals , 2006, International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN'06).

[9]  Anders J Johansson Wave-propagation from medical implants-influence of body shape on radiation pattern , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[10]  Sandeep K. S. Gupta,et al.  Energy-efficient protocols for wireless communication in biosensor networks , 2001, 12th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8598).

[11]  Benny P. L. Lo,et al.  BODY SENSOR NETWORK – A WIRELESS SENSOR PLATFORM FOR PERVASIVE HEALTHCARE MONITORING , 2005 .

[12]  Sandeep K. S. Gupta,et al.  Towards a propagation model for wireless biomedical applications , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[13]  Aleksandar Milenkovic,et al.  System architecture of a wireless body area sensor network for ubiquitous health monitoring , 2005 .