The Reality of Rhetoric in Information Systems Adoption: A Case Study Investigation of the Uk National Health Service

The UK National Health Service is undergoing a tremendous IS -led change, the purpose of which is to create a service capable of meeting the demands of the 21st century. The aim of this paper is to examine the extent to which persuasive discourse, or rhetoric, influences and affects the adoption of information systems within the health sector. It seeks to explore the ways in which various actors use rhetoric to advance their own agendas and the impact this has on the system itself. As such, the paper seeks to contribute to diffusion research through the use of a case study analysis of the implementation of an Electronic Single Patient Care Record system within one UK Health Service Trust. The findings of the paper suggest that rhetoric is an important and effective persuasive tool, employed by system trainers to coax users into not only adopting the system but also using the system in a predefined manner.

[1]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas , 1981 .

[2]  A. H. van de Ven,et al.  Commentary: The rhetoric of evidence-based medicine. , 2002, Health care management review.

[3]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion - IFIP TC8 WG 8.6 International Working Conference May 8-11, 2005, Atlanta, Georgia, USA , 2005, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion.

[4]  A. Hassey.  The National Programme for IT in the NHS. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Extending the Research Agenda on Diffusion of Innovations - The Role of Public Programs in the Diffusion of E-Business Innovations , 2007, Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation.

[6]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Information flows in the new primary care organisations: Rhetoric versus reality , 2002 .

[7]  Charles Harvey,et al.  Discourses, Rhetorical Strategies and Arguments: Conversations in an NHS Trust Hospital Board. , 2004 .

[8]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[9]  Erja Mustonen-Ollila,et al.  Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  T. Watson.  Rhetoric, Discourse and Argument in Organizational Sense Making: A Reflexive Tale , 1995 .

[11]  J. Pries-Heje,et al.  Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology , 1996, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[12]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  John Mingers,et al.  Re-Establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Interpretive research in information systems , 1998 .

[15]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  Diffusion - or delusion? Challenging an IS research tradition , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Attaining agreement: a rhetorical analysis of an NHS negotiation , 2000 .

[17]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[18]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Information Technology Diffusion Research: An Interim Balance , 2005, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion.

[19]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[20]  J. Mingers,et al.  Information Systems an Emerging Discipline , 2004 .

[21]  David Hughes,et al.  NHS managers as rhetoricians: a case of culture management? , 1996 .

[22]  Jack J. Baroudi,et al.  The Information Systems Profession: Myth or Reality? , 1988 .

[23]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[24]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[25]  Wayne C. Booth,et al.  The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication , 2004 .

[26]  J. Sillince,et al.  ‘A Rounded Picture is What We Need’: Rhetorical Strategies, Arguments, and the Negotiation of Change in a UK Hospital Trust , 2004 .

[27]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Information Technology and the Cultural Reproduction of Social Order: A Research Paradigm , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[28]  Alan Bleakley,et al.  You are who I say you are: the rhetorical construction of identity in the operating theatre , 2006 .

[29]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology , 2013, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[30]  Edward P. J. Corbett.  Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student , 1966 .

[31]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[32]  Stephen Timmons.  A failed panopticon: surveillance of nursing practice via new technology , 2003 .

[33]  Wendy Olmsted,et al.  Rhetoric: An Historical Introduction , 2006 .

[34]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Information technology transfer and implementation: The introduction of an electronic mail system in a public service organization , 1996 .

[35]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  A Framework for the Investigation of the Institutional Layer of IT Diffusion - Using stakeholder theory to analyse electronic commerce diffusion , 2003, Diffusion and Adoption of Networked Information Technologies.

[36]  Christine T. Ennew,et al.  Weapons of mass instruction? The rhetoric and reality of online learning , 2006 .

[37]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1984 .

[38]  J. Llewelyn.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1985 .

[39]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[40]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Thematic exposition , 1981 .

[41]  Sue Newell,et al.  Interorganisational networks and the diffusion process: The case of networks not working , 1996 .

[42]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.) , 2003 .

[43]  Ken Eason,et al.  Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Tom McMaster,et al.  Organizational dynamics of technology-based innovation: diversifying the research agenda , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[45]  J. Charteris-Black.  Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor , 2004 .

[46]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Implementing local pay: rhetorically analysing irritation , 1998 .

[47]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Communities of Practice and Habitus: A Critique , 2003 .

[48]  P. Hamilton,et al.  “The Vital Connection”:a rhetoric on equality , 2003 .

[49]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[50]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  ‘The biggest computer programme in the world…ever!’: time for a change in mindset? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Networked information technologies: diffusion and adoption , 2004 .

[53]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Contents , 1981 .

[54]  David W. Wainwright,et al.  The application and adaptation of a diffusion of innovation framework for information systems research in NHS general medical practice , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[55]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[56]  J. Sillince.  Resources and Organizational Identities , 2006 .

[57]  Laura Hidalgo-Downing,et al.  Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric , 1992 .