Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: behavioral and pupillometric data.

We evaluated the hypothesis that individual differences in working memory capacity are explained by variation in mental effort, persons with low capacity exerting less effort than persons with high capacity. Groups previously rated high and low in working memory capacity performed the reading span task under three levels of incentive. The effort hypothesis holds that low span subjects exert less effort during task performance than do high spans. Subjects' pupil sizes were recorded online during task performance as a measure of mental effort. Both recall performance and pupil diameter were found to be increased under incentives, but were additive with span (incentives increased performance and pupil diameter equivalently for both span groups). Contrary to the effort hypothesis, task-evoked pupillary responses indicated that if anything, low span subjects exert more effort than do high spans.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[2]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[3]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillometric measures of cognitive and emotional processes. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[5]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[7]  D. Saccuzzo,et al.  Motivation: cause or confound in information processing/intelligence correlations? , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[8]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[9]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[10]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Incentive effects and pupillary changes in association learning. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[12]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[14]  K. Klein,et al.  The reliability and stability of the turner and Engle working memory task , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[18]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Gary Christopher,et al.  The impact of clinical depression on working memory , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychiatry.

[20]  B. Goldwater Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  P. R. Bourne,et al.  Dynamics of the light reflex and the influence of age on the human pupil measured by television pupillometry [proceedings]. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[23]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[24]  R. Ornstein,et al.  Pupillary Responses During Information Processing Vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores , 2022 .

[25]  Michael Johns,et al.  Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Smith Sa,et al.  Dynamics of the light reflex and the influence of age on the human pupil measured by television pupillometry [proceedings]. , 1979 .

[27]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[28]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[29]  Josef C. Schrock,et al.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  K. Oberauer Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory. , 1996, Memory.