PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENTS WHO TAKE SYNCHRONOUS COURSES THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ABOUT DISTANCE EDUCATION

The objective of this study is to determine how students who are taking synchronous distance education classes via video conferencing perceive distance learning courses. A qualitative research approach was used for the study. Scale sampling was also used. The study’s subjects consisted of a total of nine students comprised of 2 nd and 4 th grade students engaged in a course via synchronous distance education. For the study, the case method, a qualitative research method, was used, and research data was obtained via semi-structured interviews and observation results. Data was analyzed by means of the descriptive analysis method. Findings obtained at the study’s conclusion indicate that students’ perceptions of the course changed during and at the completion of the course. It was generally seen in the descriptions students made about the environment before taking synchronous distance education that they did not have advance information or that they had a prejudice due to their misinformation. It is seen in the conducted interviews that these prejudices start to be eliminated thanks to the opportunities provided by synchronous distance education through this process. It appears, from students’ descriptions of the course environment prior to taking the course, that they did not have enough information or had preconceived ideas. As the course progressed, student perception changed and they were able to perceive more clearly the opportunities that synchronous distance education can provide. In this study, the most important problem in synchronous distance education was determined to be disconnection and sound problems. In this study, a significant problem was the hardware – i.e., sound, speed and connectivity issues. As well, students became bored after some time because of limited camera angles and cameras. It was concluded that this situation prevents the continuity of the course and so leads to distraction. On the other hand, it was observed that students start to get bored of the course after a while due to the fixedness of the camera angle and the small quantity of cameras. We also noticed that the fixed camera angle, small number of cameras and problems occurring in the images affected student perceptions. Besides these technical problems, the researchers observed, and the students expressed that the factors of teacher,

[1]  Karin Schweizer,et al.  Blended Learning as a Strategy to Improve Collaborative Task Performance , 2003 .

[2]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology , 1994 .

[3]  Paul L. Schneider,et al.  Foundations for Creative Effective Two-Way Audio/Video Distance Education Environments: Issues of Self-Efficacy. , 1998 .

[4]  Harald P. E. Vranken,et al.  Experiences with a synchronous virtual classroom in distance education , 2008, ITiCSE.

[5]  Panagiotes S. Anastasiades,et al.  Interactive Videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction , 1990 .

[7]  Michael Gough,et al.  Video Conferencing over IP: Configure, Secure, and Troubleshoot , 2006 .

[8]  Marie Martin,et al.  Seeing is believing: the role of videoconferencing in distance learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  B. W. Brown,et al.  Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics , 2002 .

[10]  Dianna L. Newman.  Videoconferencing and the K-12 Classroom: What is it? and Why do it? , 2008 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[12]  Margaret Driscoll,et al.  Web-Based Training: Creating e-Learning Experiences , 2002 .

[13]  Donald Gillies,et al.  Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance , 2008 .

[14]  A W Tony Bates,et al.  Technology, e-learning, and distance education , 1995 .

[15]  Nick Mitchell,et al.  Interactive video technology: Enhancing professional learning in initial teacher education , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[16]  John C. Sherblom,et al.  Student Perceptions of the Instructor's Relational Characteristics, the Classroom Communication Experience, and the Interaction Involvement in Face-to-Face versus Video Conference Instruction , 2008 .

[17]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education (2nd edition) , 2006 .

[18]  G Delaney,et al.  Comparison of face-to-face and videoconferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. , 2004, Australasian radiology.

[19]  S. Wheeler.  Creating Social Presence in Digital Learning Environments : A Presence of Mind ? , 2005 .

[20]  William K. Horton,et al.  Designing Web based training: how to teach anyone anything anywhere anytime , 2000 .

[21]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Ahmet Şimşek.  The wholeness teaching in history lessons: A perspective essay from Gestalt approach to holistic approach , 2008 .

[23]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[24]  Vahid Motamedi.  A Critical Look at the Use of Videoconferencing in United States Distance Education , 2001 .

[25]  Maria Lee,et al.  The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Holy COW: Scaffolding Case Based Conferencing on the Web with Preservice Teachers. , 2001 .

[27]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  The Death of Distance: Documenting the Effects of Distance Education In South Dakota , 2005 .

[28]  Dianna L. Newman,et al.  Videoconferencing Technology in K-12 Instruction: Best Practices and Trends , 2007 .