Elasticity–density and viscoelasticity–density relationships at the tibia mid-diaphysis assessed from resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurements

Cortical bone tissue is an anisotropic material characterized by typically five independent elastic coefficients (for transverse isotropy) governing shear and longitudinal deformations in the different anatomical directions. It is well established that the Young’s modulus in the direction of the bone axis of long bones has a strong relationship with mass density. It is not clear, however, whether relationships of similar strength exist for the other elastic coefficients, for they have seldom been investigated, and the results available in the literature are contradictory. The objectives of the present work were to document the anisotropic elastic properties of cortical bone at the tibia mid-diaphysis and to elucidate their relationships with mass density. Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) was used to measure the transverse isotropic stiffness tensor of 55 specimens from 19 donors. Except for Poisson’s ratios and the non-diagonal stiffness coefficient, strong linear correlations between the different elastic coefficients $$(0.7 < {r^{2}} < 0.99)$$(0.7<r2<0.99) and between these coefficients and density $$(0.79 < {r^{2}} < 0.89)$$(0.79<r2<0.89) were found. Comparison with previously published data from femur specimens suggested that the strong correlations evidenced in this study may not only be valid for the mid-tibia. RUS also measures the viscous part of the stiffness tensor. An anisotropy ratio close to two was found for damping coefficients. Damping increased as the mass density decreased. The data suggest that a relatively accurate estimation of all the mid-tibia elastic coefficients can be derived from mass density. This is of particular interest (1) to design organ-scale bone models in which elastic coefficients are mapped according to Hounsfield values from computed tomography scans as a surrogate for mass density and (2) to model ultrasound propagation at the mid-tibia, which is an important site for the in vivo assessment of bone status with axial transmission techniques.

[1]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Change in porosity is the major determinant of the variation of cortical bone elasticity at the millimeter scale in aged women. , 2011, Bone.

[3]  P. Laugier,et al.  A determination of the minimum sizes of representative volume elements for the prediction of cortical bone elastic properties , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[4]  M. Popovtzer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. , 1995, Bone.

[5]  J. Currey,et al.  Strain rate and mineral content in fracture models of bone , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  D. Mitton,et al.  Assessment of cortical bone elasticity and strength: mechanical testing and ultrasound provide complementary data. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  P. Laugier,et al.  A two-parameter model of the effective elastic tensor for cortical bone. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  S. Naili,et al.  Analytical methods to determine the effective mesoscopic and macroscopic elastic properties of cortical bone , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[10]  M. Talmant,et al.  Guided Waves in Cortical Bone , 2011 .

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. L. Vance,et al.  Determinants of ovine compact bone viscoelastic properties: effects of architecture, mineralization, and remodeling. , 2004, Bone.

[13]  C. Hellmich,et al.  Micromechanics-Based Conversion of CT Data into Anisotropic Elasticity Tensors, Applied to FE Simulations of a Mandible , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R. G. Leisure,et al.  Internal friction studies by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy , 2004 .

[15]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Jean-Gabriel Minonzio,et al.  Combined estimation of thickness and velocities using ultrasound guided waves: a pioneering study on in vitro cortical bone samples , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[17]  E. Schneider,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Ryan K Roeder,et al.  Anatomic variation in the elastic inhomogeneity and anisotropy of human femoral cortical bone tissue is consistent across multiple donors. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  A. V. Lebedev,et al.  Method of linear prediction in the ultrasonic spectroscopy of rock , 2002 .

[20]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Kay Raum,et al.  Spatial-temporal mapping of bone structural and elastic properties in a sheep model following osteotomy. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  D. Mitton,et al.  Non Destructive Characterization of Cortical Bone Micro-Damage by Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  J. Rho An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. , 1996, Ultrasonics.

[24]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Distribution of mesoscale elastic properties and mass density in the human femoral shaft , 2015, Connective tissue research.

[25]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Tibia Depends on Both Cortical Density and Thickness , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  K. Raum,et al.  Microelastic imaging of bone , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  T. Ulrich,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of rock samples using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S. Uda,et al.  Elastic, anelastic, and piezoelectric coefficients of langasite: resonance ultrasound spectroscopy with laser-Doppler interferometry , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Accurate measurement of cortical bone elasticity tensor with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[32]  Roderic S. Lakes,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of Cortical Bone , 2001 .

[33]  R. Lakes,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone--II. Relaxation mechanisms. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  X. Guo,et al.  Prediction of cortical bone elastic constants by a two-level micromechanical model using a generalized self-consistent method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  G. Haiat Linear ultrasonic properties of cortical bone: in vitro studies , 2011 .

[36]  X. Yang,et al.  Positive alterations of viscoelastic and geometric properties in ovariectomized rat femurs with concurrent administration of ibandronate and PTH. , 2013, Bone.

[37]  G. Pharr,et al.  Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nano-indentation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  M. Belmonte,et al.  Anisotropic elastic moduli and internal friction of graphene nanoplatelets/silicon nitride composites , 2013 .

[39]  A. Migliori Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy , 2016 .

[40]  Weimin Yue,et al.  Specimen-specific multi-scale model for the anisotropic elastic constants of human cortical bone. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  K. Raum,et al.  Assessment of Anisotropic Tissue Elasticity of Cortical Bone from High-Resolution, Angular Acoustic Measurements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[42]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[43]  M. Belmonte,et al.  Sensitivity of the resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to weak gradients of elastic properties. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Bayesian normal modes identification and estimation of elastic coefficients in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy , 2015 .

[45]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study , 2010, The Lancet.

[47]  W. Parnell,et al.  The influence of mesoscale porosity on cortical bone anisotropy. Investigations via asymptotic homogenization , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[48]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[49]  J M Crolet,et al.  Compact bone: numerical simulation of mechanical characteristics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  Christian Hellmich,et al.  Can the diverse elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone be attributed to only a few tissue-independent phase properties and their interactions? , 2004, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[51]  R. Brand,et al.  Viscoelastic dissipation in compact bone: implications for stress-induced fluid flow in bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[52]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Plasticity and toughness in bone , 2009 .

[53]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  S. Cheng,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Cortical Bone Characteristics In Vivo , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[55]  N. Sasaki,et al.  Anisotropic viscoelastic properties of cortical bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[56]  R. Lakes,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation and attenuation in wet bone. , 1986, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[57]  X Edward Guo,et al.  The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[58]  Richard Schapery,et al.  A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media , 1975 .

[59]  Michal Landa,et al.  Modal resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for ferroelastics , 2009 .

[60]  Ryan K Roeder,et al.  Anatomic variation in the elastic anisotropy of cortical bone tissue in the human femur. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[61]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  To what extent can cortical bone millimeter-scale elasticity be predicted by a two-phase composite model with variable porosity? , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[62]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for viscoelastic characterization of anisotropic attenuative solid materials. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.