Testing the Effect of Serve Order in Tennis Tiebreak

Abstract The order of actions in contests may generate different psychological effects which, in turn, may influence contestants’ probabilities to win. The Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence in which the first ‘n’ moves is the exact mirror image of the next ‘n’ moves should theoretically terminate any advantage to any of the contestants in a sequential pair-wise contest. The tennis tiebreak sequence of serves is the closest to the Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence that one can find in real tournament settings. In a tiebreak between two players, A and B, the order of the first two serves (AB) is a mirror image of the next two serves (BA), such that the sequence of the first four serves is ABBA. Then, this sequence is repeated until one player wins the tiebreak. This sequence has been used not only in tennis, but also recently in the US TV presidential debates. In this study we analyse 1701 men’s and 920 women’s tiebreak games from top-tier tournaments between the years 2012 to 2015. Using several different strategies to disentangle the effect of serving first from the effect of selection, we find that, for both genders, serving first does not have any significant effect on the winning probabilities of the two players. Thus, it might be useful for other sports, and contests in general, to consider adopting the ABBA sequence.

[1]  P. Rey,et al.  Buyer Power and Intrabrand Coordination , 2011 .

[2]  Mario Pagliero,et al.  Interim Rank, Risk Taking, and Performance in Dynamic Tournaments , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Ignacio Isabel Palacios-Huerta Tournaments, Fairness and the Prouhet‐Thue‐Morse Sequence , 2012 .

[4]  Lionel Page,et al.  Last shall be first: A field study of biases in sequential performance evaluation on the Idol series , 2010 .

[5]  Christopher R. Taber,et al.  Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  John Coates,et al.  Winner and loser effects in human competitions. Evidence from equally matched tennis players , 2017 .

[7]  E. Oster Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence , 2019 .

[8]  Victor Ginsburgh,et al.  Expert opinion and compensation: evidence from a musical competition , 2015 .

[9]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Making the Rules of Sports Fairer , 2016, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Mario Pagliero,et al.  When Pressure Sinks Performance: Evidence from Diving Competitions , 2012 .

[11]  D. Cohen-Zada,et al.  Psychological Momentum and Gender , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  Mosi Rosenboim,et al.  Choking Under Pressure and Gender: Evidence from Professional Tennis , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  J. Neyman,et al.  Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations , 1948 .

[14]  J. Magnus,et al.  Are Points in Tennis Independent and Identically Distributed? Evidence From a Dynamic Binary Panel Data Model , 2001 .

[15]  Lawrence M. Kahn The Sports Business as a Labor Market Laboratory , 2000 .

[16]  J. Vickers,et al.  Racing with Uncertainty , 1987 .

[17]  Olivier Gossner,et al.  Performing best when it matters most: Evidence from professional tennis , 2012 .

[18]  Lionel Page,et al.  Does Success Breed Success? a Quasi-Experiment on Strategic Momentum in Dynamic Contests , 2019, The Economic Journal.

[19]  David A. Malueg,et al.  Testing Contest Theory: Evidence from Best-of-Three Tennis Matches , 2010, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  Jeffrey Shallit,et al.  The Ubiquitous Prouhet-Thue-Morse Sequence , 1998, SETA.

[21]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta,et al.  Psychological Pressure in Competitive Environments: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment , 2008 .

[22]  Michael Lechner,et al.  The performance of estimators based on the propensity score , 2013 .

[23]  J. Magnus,et al.  On the advantage of serving first in a tennis set: four years at Wimbledon , 1999 .

[24]  Tilman Klumpp,et al.  Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect , 2006 .

[25]  J. G. Kingston Comparison of Scoring Systems in Two-Sided Competitions , 1976, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[26]  Stefan Szymanski,et al.  The Economic Design of Sporting Contests , 2003 .

[27]  AN INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT AUMANN , 2005, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[28]  W. B. D. Bruin,et al.  Save the last dance for me: unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations , 2005 .

[29]  Mosi Rosenboim,et al.  Gender, Competitiveness, and Physical Characteristics , 2016 .

[30]  M. Lechner,et al.  Radius matching on the propensity score with bias adjustment: tuning parameters and finite sample behaviour , 2015 .

[31]  R. Koning Home advantage in professional tennis , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[32]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Long-Run Effects of Public Sector Sponsored Training in West Germany , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[33]  C. L. Anderson Note on the Advantage of First Serve , 1977, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[34]  W. Greene,et al.  The Behaviour of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects , 2004 .

[35]  J. González-Díaz,et al.  Cognitive performance in competitive environments: Evidence from a natural experiment , 2016 .