Hydraulic resistance measurements combined with electrical or diffusional resistance measurements for determination of pore size in MF membranes

[1]  A. Foissy,et al.  Determining the Zeta Potential of Porous Membranes Using Electrolyte Conductivity inside Pores. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  I. Masselin.  Determination of the porosity to thickness ratio Ak/Δx for UF and MF membranes by diffusion experiments , 2000 .

[3]  P. Fiévet,et al.  Evaluation of three methods for the characterisation of the membraneâsolution interface: streaming potential, membrane potential and electrolyte conductivity inside pores , 2000 .

[4]  Anthony Szymczyk,et al.  An application of the space charge model to the electrolyte conductivity inside a charged microporous membrane , 1999 .

[5]  A. Szymczyk,et al.  Electrokinetic characterization of mixed alumina-titania-silica MF membranes by streaming potential measurements , 1998 .

[6]  J. Saja,et al.  Surface structure of microporous membranes by computerized SEM image analysis applied to Anopore filters , 1997 .

[7]  William J. Koros,et al.  Ceramic membrane characterization via the bubble point technique , 1997 .

[8]  Pedro Prádanos,et al.  Pore size distributions in microporous membranes. A critical analysis of the bubble point extended method , 1996 .

[9]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Atomic force microscope studies of membranes: Surface pore structures of Cyclopore and Anopore membranes , 1996 .

[10]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  Permporometry study on the size distribution of active pores in porous ceramic membranes , 1993 .

[11]  S. J. Gregg,et al.  Adsorption Surface Area and Porosity , 1967 .