Diagnostic performance of knee ultrasonography for detecting degenerative changes of articular cartilage.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic performance of non-invasive knee ultrasonography (US) to detect degenerative changes of articular cartilage using arthroscopic grading as the gold standard. DESIGN Forty adult patients referred to a knee arthroscopy because of knee pain were randomly selected for the study. Before the arthroscopy, knee US was performed and cartilage surfaces at medial and lateral femoral condyles as well as at intercondylar notch area (sulcus) were semi-quantitatively graded from US. Ultrasonographic grading was compared with the arthroscopic Noyes' grading for cartilage degeneration. RESULTS Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio for detecting arthroscopic cartilage changes in US varied between 52 and 83%, 50-100%, 88-100%, 24-46%, and 5.0-13.0, respectively, depending on the site. Correlation of severity of cartilage changes (grades) between US and arthroscopy varied from insignificant to significant depending on the site: at the sulcus area the correlation was highest (r(s)=0.593, P<0.001), at the medial condyle also significant (r(s)=0.465, P=0.003), and at the lateral condyle non-significant (r(s)=0.262, P=0.103). The sum of cartilage grades in all three sites of the femoral cartilage between US and arthroscopy had the highest correlation (r(s)=0.655, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Positive finding in US is a strong indicator of arthroscopic degenerative changes of cartilage, but negative finding does not rule out degenerative changes. Non-invasive knee US is a promising technique for screening of degenerative changes of articular cartilage, e.g., during osteoarthritis.

[1]  Michelle Urwin,et al.  Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  B. Moretti,et al.  Validity of echographic evaluation of cartilage in gonarthrosis. Preliminary report , 1993, Clinical Rheumatology.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity , 1994 .

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Arthroscopic Ultrasound Assessment of Articular Cartilage in the Human Knee Joint , 2011, Cartilage.

[6]  P L Carson,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. , 1984, Radiology.

[7]  H. J. Mankin,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and Osteoarthrosis, Repair, Regeneration, and Transplantation*† , 1997 .

[8]  J Uson,et al.  Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  A. Iagnocco,et al.  Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage with morphologic, acoustic and mechanical properties obtained using high-frequency ultrasound. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  H. Keen,et al.  A systematic review of ultrasonography in osteoarthritis , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  I Cavazzana,et al.  Mechanisms of immune-mediated skin diseases: an overview. , 2006, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[13]  Walter Grassi,et al.  Ultrasonography in osteoarthritis. , 2004, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  A. Tennant,et al.  Impact of multiple joint problems on daily living tasks in people in the community over age fifty-five. , 2006, Arthritis & Rheumatism.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[16]  A. Iagnocco,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of femoral condylar cartilage in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[17]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  H. Bonel,et al.  Measuring finger joint cartilage by ultrasound as a promising alternative to conventional radiograph imaging. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  M. Dougados,et al.  EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: Prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  A. Iagnocco,et al.  Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist VIII. Ultrasound imaging in osteoarthritis. , 2007, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[22]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .