Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach

Objectives: To provide an overview of alternative approaches to modelling in economic evaluation, and to highlight situations where each of the alternative modelling techniques should be employed. Methods: A review of the available approaches to modelling in the economic evaluation of health care interventions with a leading discussion of examples of published studies leading to guidance in the selection of an appropriate approach in different circumstances. Results: The main approaches to modelling used in economic evaluations in health care are decision trees, Markov models and individual sampling models. These methods assume independence of individuals within the model. Where interaction between individuals is important, other methods such as discrete-event simulation or system dynamics are preferable. Conclusions: The paper highlights the crucial question to be answered when selecting the approach to modelling: can the individuals being simulated in the model be regarded as independent? This issue is very commonly not recognised by analysts but is fundamental to the appropriate application of modelling in economic evaluation.

[1]  K Claxton,et al.  The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[2]  J R Beck,et al.  Markov Models in Medical Decision Making , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  J Karnon,et al.  Selecting a decision model for economic evaluation: a case study and review , 1998, Health care management science.

[4]  J C Jager,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach. , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  M J Buxton,et al.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. , 1997, Health economics.

[6]  Tillal Eldabi,et al.  A Simulation Modelling Approach to Evaluating Alternative Policies for the Management of the Waiting List for Liver Transplantation , 2001, Health care management science.

[7]  A H Briggs,et al.  Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[8]  Stephen Ward,et al.  Arguments for Constructively Simple Models , 1989 .

[9]  M. Drummond,et al.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[10]  J Raftery,et al.  NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Methodological quality of economic modelling studies. A case study with hepatitis B vaccines. , 1998, PharmacoEconomics.

[12]  B R Luce,et al.  Health and economic outcomes modeling practices: a suggested framework. , 1998, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Computer Simulation in Management Science (3rd Edition) , 1998 .

[14]  K. Warner,et al.  Health and economic implications of a work-site smoking-cessation program: a simulation analysis. , 1996, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[15]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  M. Mugford,et al.  Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[17]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care. , 1996, Health economics.

[18]  J R P Townshend,et al.  Analysing the effectiveness of Chlamydia screening , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  W. M. Hart,et al.  A simulation model of the cost of the incidence of IDDM in Spain , 1997, Diabetologia.