Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Management of Intracanalicular Testes in Pediatrics.

Introduction: Undescended testis is a relatively common congenital anomaly in male children with a prevalence of 1%-2% in live births. Upon discovering an empty scrotum, it is important to determine whether the testis is palpable, ectopic, retractile, or nonpalpable. A canalicular or "emergent" testis is a peeping one that freely slides to and fro between the abdominal cavity and inguinal canal. It may be impalpable initially, but at a time, it emerges from the internal ring to be palpable when it is "milked" down (where it was concealed from detection). It is reported that 15%-40% of cryptorchidism are viable peeping/canalicular testis. The laparoscopic approach for treating intracanalicular undescended testes offers many advantages over open inguinal orchiopexy. It maintains the integrity of the inguinal canal and eliminates the need to divide the epigastric vessels during dissection. The ability to dissect the testicular vessels at a higher level would increase the vessel length available to bring the testis down to the scrotum without strain. The aim of this study is to present our experience and evaluate laparoscopic approach for management of intracanalicular testes regarding operative safety, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Department of Pediatric Surgery, MCH Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia and Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt, in the period from October 2018 to August 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic orchiopexy for intracanalicular testis. Patients with retractile testes, ectopic testes, testes located distal to the external inguinal ring, and nonpalpable testes were excluded from the study. Results: The study was conducted on 62 male children with 70 intracanalicular (peeping) testes, with age range from 8 months to 48 months (mean age: 24 months). Among them, 26 cases (∼42%) were left-sided, 28 (∼45%) were right-sided, and 8 (∼13%) cases were affected bilaterally. Postoperatively, all testes maintained good size without postoperative hydrocele or inguinal hernia. One case (1.4%) required open redo-orchiopexy because of testicular re-ascent to the level of scrotal neck. Moreover, there was no evidence of testicular atrophy confirmed by postoperative ultrasonography. All patients had good satisfied cosmetic results obtained by parent's questionnaire at postoperative follow-up visits. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchiopexy for management of (intracanalicular) undescended testes is safe, effective, less invasive, without disturbance of inguinal canal anatomy, and with better cosmetic results.

[1]  Hai-tao Chen,et al.  Laparoscopic orchiopexy of palpable undescended testes_ experience of a single tertiary institution with over 773 cases , 2019, BMC Pediatrics.

[2]  S. S. St. Peter,et al.  The risk of developing a symptomatic inguinal hernia in children with an asymptomatic patent processus vaginalis. , 2017, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Single scrotal incision orchiopexy versus the inguinal approach in children with palpable undescended testis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Pediatric Surgery International.

[4]  B. Wildhaber,et al.  Long-term outcome of children with patent processus vaginalis incidentally diagnosed by laparoscopy. , 2015, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[5]  H. Hammouda,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of peeping testis: a multi-institutional prospective randomized study. , 2014, Journal of pediatric urology.

[6]  H. Heij,et al.  The value of ultrasonography in boys with a non-palpable testis. , 2014, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  A. Holland,et al.  Surgical approach to the palpable undescended testis , 2014, Pediatric Surgery International.

[8]  A. Zani,et al.  Orchidopexy without ligation of the processus vaginalis is not associated with an increased risk of inguinal hernia , 2014, Hernia.

[9]  A. Khairi,et al.  Is it necessary to close the peritoneum over the deep inguinal ring during laparoscopic orchidopexy? , 2013, Journal of pediatric urology.

[10]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes: factors predicting success. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[11]  F. Liu,et al.  Laparoscopic orchiopexy for treating inguinal canalicular palpable undescended testis. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[12]  Abstracts of the 5th European Congress of Andrology. November 26-38, 2008. Rome, Italy. , 2008, International journal of andrology.

[13]  W. Snodgrass,et al.  Scrotal exploration for unilateral nonpalpable testis. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[14]  M. Riquelme,et al.  Laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes: a five-year experience. , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[15]  U. Hesser,et al.  Testicular growth from birth to two years of age, and the effect of orchidopexy at age nine months: a randomized, controlled study. , 2006 .

[16]  A. Kirsch,et al.  Surgical management of the nonpalpable testis: the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experience. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[17]  G. Livermore,et al.  Cryptorchidism , 1983, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.