The role of Broca’s area in speech perception: Evidence from aphasia revisited

Motor theories of speech perception have been re-vitalized as a consequence of the discovery of mirror neurons. Some authors have even promoted a strong version of the motor theory, arguing that the motor speech system is critical for perception. Part of the evidence that is cited in favor of this claim is the observation from the early 1980s that individuals with Broca's aphasia, and therefore inferred damage to Broca's area, can have deficits in speech sound discrimination. Here we re-examine this issue in 24 patients with radiologically confirmed lesions to Broca's area and various degrees of associated non-fluent speech production. Patients performed two same-different discrimination tasks involving pairs of CV syllables, one in which both CVs were presented auditorily, and the other in which one syllable was auditorily presented and the other visually presented as an orthographic form; word comprehension was also assessed using word-to-picture matching tasks in both auditory and visual forms. Discrimination performance on the all-auditory task was four standard deviations above chance, as measured using d', and was unrelated to the degree of non-fluency in the patients' speech production. Performance on the auditory-visual task, however, was worse than, and not correlated with, the all-auditory task. The auditory-visual task was related to the degree of speech non-fluency. Word comprehension was at ceiling for the auditory version (97% accuracy) and near ceiling for the orthographic version (90% accuracy). We conclude that the motor speech system is not necessary for speech perception as measured both by discrimination and comprehension paradigms, but may play a role in orthographic decoding or in auditory-visual matching of phonological forms.

[1]  Feng Rong,et al.  Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization , 2011, Neuron.

[2]  Stephen M. Wilson,et al.  Speech perception when the motor system is compromised , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Michael Weller,et al.  Anterior opercular cortex lesions cause dissociated lower cranial nerve palsies and anarthria but no aphasia: Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome and “automatic voluntary dissociation” revisited , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[4]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics , 2010 .

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The perception and production of Voice-Onset Time in aphasia , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  G. Paxinos,et al.  Atlas of the Human Brain , 2000 .

[8]  A. Liberman Some Results of Research on Speech Perception , 1957 .

[9]  David Poeppel,et al.  Feedforward and feedback in speech perception: Revisiting analysis by synthesis , 2011 .

[10]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[11]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  M Leclercq,et al.  The anatomy of aphasia revisited , 2000, Neurology.

[14]  Tracy Love,et al.  Are mirror neurons the basis of speech perception? Evidence from five cases with damage to the purported human mirror system , 2011, Neurocase.

[15]  N Makris,et al.  Analysis of lesions by MRI in stroke patients with acoustic‐phonetic processing deficits , 1995, Neurology.

[16]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory–auditory/orosensory internal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Lotto,et al.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Articulatory bias in speech categorization: Evidence from use-induced motor plasticity , 2011, Cortex.

[23]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[24]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[26]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  E. Lenneberg Understanding language without ability to speak: a case report. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[29]  Kayoko Okada,et al.  Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: Evidence from Wada procedures , 2008, Brain and Language.

[30]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Exploring the processing continuum of single-word comprehension in aphasia. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand Actions and Speech Representation in Broca's Area , 2006, Cortex.

[33]  H. Damasio Human Brain Anatomy in Computerized Images , 1995 .

[34]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[35]  Lauren L. Cloutman,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of oral reading in acute left hemispheric stroke , 2011, Brain and Language.

[36]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[37]  David Poeppel,et al.  Analysis by Synthesis: A (Re-)Emerging Program of Research for Language and Vision , 2010, Biolinguistics.

[38]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia , 1980, Brain and Language.

[39]  L. Vignolo,et al.  Phonemic Identification Defect in Aphasia , 1977, Cortex.

[40]  Maya L. Henry,et al.  Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates , 2009, Cortex.

[41]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Interaction between phonological and semantic factors in auditory comprehension , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Edward H Herskovits,et al.  Neural regions essential for reading and spelling of words and pseudowords , 2007, Annals of neurology.

[43]  D. Bishop,et al.  The relationship between phoneme discrimination, speech production, and language comprehension in cerebral-palsied individuals. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of Motor Excitability during Speech Perception: The Role of Broca's Area , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[46]  董瑞国,et al.  Aphasia , 2003, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[47]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  The Essential Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception , 2007, Current Biology.

[48]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply , 1999 .

[49]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[50]  N. Dronkers,et al.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.

[51]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[53]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Differential activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for pseudowords and real words: An event‐related fMRI study on auditory lexical decision , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[54]  L. Fadiga,et al.  The Motor Somatotopy of Speech Perception , 2009, Current Biology.

[55]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.